• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / FirstPort / Janet Entwistle to Bottomley: £100,000 ‘goodwill’ payment over Cirrus scam stays and she welcomes meeting with MPs and the Campaign against Residential Leasehold Exploitation

Janet Entwistle to Bottomley: £100,000 ‘goodwill’ payment over Cirrus scam stays and she welcomes meeting with MPs and the Campaign against Residential Leasehold Exploitation

December 18, 2013 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

JanetEntwistleJanet Entwistle, the Peverel chief executive, won’t increase the compensation – Peverel terms it ‘goodwill’ – offered to sites that were likely to have been cheated in the price-fixing scandal.

Her decision is made in reply to Sir Peter Bottomley – copied in to LibDem Cabinet minister Ed Davey and Labour MP Jim Fitzpatrick – who last week urged her to increase the compensation to “beyond 25 per cent” of the total sum involved, or to accept mediation.

Entwistle repeats her regret that the scandal occurred and her view that “these practices were completely unacceptable”.

 “As you will appreciate in the course of their investigation the OFT has had full disclosure of and access to all our information. The OFT made no finding of whether there was any over-payment for work carried out but we do accept the OFT conclusion that it is likely there was some over-payment for the systems that were supplied and installed by Cirrus. We can’t know what the price would have been without collusive tendering, but we have decided to make a goodwill payment to the contingency funds of affected developments of 10% of the price of any resulting work. We consider this to be an appropriate amount.

“I am pleased to see that you support mediation as I believe that greater use of mediation would be beneficial in many leasehold issues and is something we would generally support. However, the OFT which is an independent body, established by Parliament has made a decision following a four-year investigation, during which we have made all information available. With that in mind I do not believe mediation is appropriate here. I appreciate the concerns you have raised and I would like to offer reassurance about how Peverel Group does business today.” 

Entwistle’s full reply is here:

Peter Bottomley Reply – 18.12.13

She also forwarded to Sir Peter, Peverel’s Customer Charter and Code of Conduct.

Related posts:

Default ThumbnailCampaign against Residential Leasehold Exploitation meets lawyers over Peverel price-fixing scandal No change over Cirrus retirement scam, says Entwistle, although Peverel leaves an open goal for compo claims Default ThumbnailJanet Entwistle says no current Peverel staff ‘linked’ to Cirrus scam Default ThumbnailRipped-off pensioners, betrayed Campaign against Residential Leasehold Exploitation whistleblowers, four-year tokenistic OFT inquiry, cost: £500,000, craven trade bodies, Cirrus unpunished, stooges go into ‘liquidation’ … one minnow fined £1,777 Campaign against Residential Leasehold Exploitation whistleblowers were THREATENED with prosecution if they went public over OFT’s toothless £500k investigation into Peverel-Cirrus

Category: FirstPort, News, Peverel Cirrus story so far, Sir Peter BottomleyTag: Cirrus, Janet Entwistle, Peverel, Sir Peter Bottomley

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « National Business Awards will not remove an award to Cirrus Communications in 2009 – even though 15% was for ethics!
Next Post: Israel Moskovitz ‘unappealing conduct’ reported in The Oldie »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    December 18, 2013 at 8:04 pm

    Miss Entwistle,
    Do you think for the slightest moment that as a result of your letter, we are going to say “Fair enough, that is it, we accept your decision?”
    Have any of your advisers had the courage to tell you “Do this Janet and there will be a reaction We are getting into deep trouble over this?”

  2. Chas

    December 19, 2013 at 2:10 am

    Michael
    Check out Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation for replies to Janet Entwistle.

  3. AM

    December 19, 2013 at 10:23 am

    This proves beyond any doubt that she is not the person to lead this company. Those with any amount of PM experience will know that it is entirely possible to assess the scope of the installation and arrive at a cost of installation, which you then adjust back to the time of installation, using anything from tender price indices to evidence from experienced installers. This has always been this lot’s problem, they ceased doing property management in 2000 and because a money grabber with staff who know little about PM.

  4. Michael Epstein

    December 20, 2013 at 8:37 am

    If you look at management jobs offered by Peverel, you will see they ask for candidates to be experienced in the property management industry and preferably be members or the IRPM.
    Janet Entwistle was appointed CEO without any property management experience by Electra /Chammonix. Indeed Miss Entwistle says she has a lot to learn in her very first statement.
    Incidentally, it appears she failed to disclose that she has put money into Peverel, charged at 9% interest. We are told Electra/Chammonix bought Peverel out of administration. Yet we now find Peverel are paying the purchase price back to the new owners and in addition are paying interest rates of between 9 and 15%.
    It would be my contention, that the “buyout” was only meant to serve as a vehicle to prevent Peverel being liquidated and allow Vincent Tchenguiz to buy the company back. Remember, the business model requires both freeholding and managing companies to be connected to succeed.
    Within days of failing to buy back Peverel, Tchenguiz bankers ordered a sale of his property portfolio.
    Electra/Chammonix have been left with a company they never expected to still own. Thus the price fixing was not a factor, as they fully expected Tchenguiz to own the company long before the OFT report.

  5. Reins

    December 20, 2013 at 3:49 pm

    Good grief.! What a load of fluff. It sounds like a Christmas bonus staff at Perivale might get for a job well done.
    Own up, Pay Up and then Don’t do it again.

    Ps Note she & Her staff have been paid during the 4 years she refers to whilst those on receiving end had to contend with stress, loss of money and sleepless nights for over 4 years.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web