• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Leasehold houses and the sales process were ‘absolutely disgusting’, MPs told. But have laws been broken?

Leasehold houses and the sales process were ‘absolutely disgusting’, MPs told. But have laws been broken?

April 26, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Charities and housing associations are ‘ripped off’ as bogus sales prices are recorded on Land Registry, it is claimed

Many leasehold house buyers are in negative equity owing to over-valuations

Developers’ ‘morally debatable’ conduct over leasehold house sales, with ‘huge benefits’ to use recommended solicitors

If developer recommended solicitors complete within 28 days, there is a £5,000 ‘discount’

Developer recommended solicitors seek to limit liability and buried warnings of conflicts of interest

Appeal to cap the ground rent on existing leases to save existing leasehold owners with onerous terms.

Solicitor Mari Knowles tells MPs and APPG guests she was ‘absolutely disgusted’, after examining 100 conveyancing files of leasehold houses and flats with onerous ground rent terms.

The All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform was told that leasehold houses and the sales process involved in offloading them onto buyers were “absolutely disgusting”.

Homebuyers are “pressured” into accepting discounts to use recommended professionals – solicitors, mortgage advisors – to complete the deals.

Inflated prices are recorded on the Land Registry that ignore discounts – called “allowances” or “incentives” by developers – which can amount to £80,000 off the price.

Housing charities and housing associations then buy up the unsold properties unaware of the substantial discounts already obtained, homebuyers claim.

LKP questions whether developers’ bankers are aware that prices on the Land Registry may often be bogus.

Ordinary home buyers have also bought over-valued properties, and many are very likely to be in negative equity.

This disturbing picture of the leasehold housing market was outlined to MPs by Mari Knowles, a former conveyancing solicitor, who now runs Leasehold Law.

She has spent four months analysing more than 100 conveyancing files of leasehold house owners.

“With leases, you usually see a natural burden and benefit on the part of both sides: the freeholder and the leaseholders.

“The leases here are very onerous and very one-sided, and are nothing more than a money-making mechanism.

“One thing that has not been addressed at all is that of the valuation of these leasehold houses.

“It is a recurring theme in all these conveyancing files that just before leaseholders are about to purchase, the mortgage valuations come in and quickly identify that these leasehold houses have actually been overvalued.

“Some of these leasehold houses have been overvalued by as much as £80,000.

“Normally, when you have got a over-valuation the property price is just reduced, and you buy it for the reduced price.

“But the way the developers have dealt with this was by way of an ‘allowance’, rather than a price reduction.

“My clients have asked the developers to explain why. They have been told that it is because quite a lot of the housing stock is being sold to housing associations and housing charities. Developers need to keep the recorded purchase price on the high side in order to validate those prices for sale to the housing associations.”

“So, they are ripping off charities?” asked Sir Peter Bottomley.

“Yes. That is why I am here today to unearth these findings.

“It is absolutely disgusting.

The All Party Parliamentary Group was appalled to hear of developers’ sharp practices: bogus prices recorded on the Land Registry; buyers in negative equity after paying too much; developer recommended solicitors rushing the sales process; developer recommended solicitors seeking to limit their professional liability – and giving buyers the briefest, tokenistic warning that there may be conflicts of interest

“I have taken witness statements. It goes further than that.

“It is not just about covering up the real value of these properties.

“When you read the conveyancing files – and I must stress that I’m not convinced that I am being given all the conveyancing files and I do think that there is paperwork missing – what is not evident is that these miscalculations in purchase price are always being reported back to whoever is handling the day-to-day mortgage.

“I’m very worried that a lot of leaseholders are taking out mortgages for more than what the property is actually worth.

“This means that they are currently in negative equity.

“When you are looking at over-valuations of £80,000, and that is not for just one property, then this is a huge issue and one that I would please ask should be further investigated.

“What the developers have done is clearly morally debatable. Whether or not there is any action in law, or whether anything they have done is actually unlawful, are completely different.”

Mari Knowles then moved on to consider the role of solicitors in the leasehold houses scandal.

“It is very clear that the same small group of solicitors come up time and time again.

“Solicitors are heavily regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, but there are an awful lot of grey areas.

“I have encountered sharp practices, but I do not think at this stage that the data amounts to a professional negligence claim.

“I have seen heavily reduced legal fees, or subsidised legal fees. I have seen guarantees that solicitors can get the conveyancing through in 28 days, attracting the £5,000 reduction in the purchase price offered by the developers.

“I have seen a limitation of liability in a conveyancing solicitors’ terms of business.

“Usually, solicitors can be sued for up to six years. One firm of solicitors has reduced this in the small print of its terms of business limitation of liability to only three years.

“This has only come to light in the three to six-year period after the purchase. So, we could now face a legal argument whether or not exclusion of liability in solicitors’ terms of business is legally binding or not.

“I have also seen the production of reports on title to clients mere days before the 28-day deadline where developers offer a £5,000 discount on the purchase price.

“My concern with that is that £5,000 is an awful lot of money.

“It is a difficult decision for the purchasers. If they have read the report they may have questions. But the solicitor, on the other hand, is saying if you don’t complete within the next two days or so you will lose the £5,000.

“Even if the leaseholders were given the correct information, they were not given adequate time and access to the solicitors to ask questions about the meaning of what was in report.

“Lastly, on the conflict of interest point regarding solicitors, I have seen some solicitors saying in their covering letters that Rule Three of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 applies. There is no explanation of what Rule Three is.

“There is no further advice, and there is no offer of assistance if the leaseholders wish to discuss this.

“Rule Three of the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007 is the rule that states that there is a conflict of interest. The Solicitors Regulation Authority requires all solicitors to declare if there is a conflict of interest.

“So, in some of these cases there are conveyancing solicitors who are clearly in a position of conflict. They are doing the absolute bare minimum to advise that clients there was a conflict.

“When I asked clients whether they knew what this meant the obvious answer was no. They did not have a clue. Solicitors produce an awful lot of legal paperwork and leaseholders cannot be expected to know the minutiae of the 2007 regulations.”

Mari Knowles has also examined the role of mortgage companies and surveyors.

“It is clear that valuers acting for mortgage companies did know about the ground rents. But when you look at the mortgage valuation report in the conveyancing paperwork, every single case only refers to the initial ground rent. Not to the doubling ground rent.

“I am still waiting for answers from mortgage companies to ascertain whether or not they knew that the ground rent doubled, or if they were told on day one it was just a fixed ground rent.

“Of course, all leaseholders’ communications with the mortgage company and the mortgage valuers were dealt with by their financial advisors, who were in turn recommended by the developer.

“I would urge that we not only look at prohibiting leasehold houses, but we also do something to assist those leaseholders who already have these leases.

“In my opinion, the quickest way of doing this would be to cap the ground rent on existing leases.

“I appreciate that is going to have huge financial implications and that it is going to be controversial. But by capping the ground rent that will minimise the amount that leaseholders will have to pay when they enfranchise.

“It will also stop the position where someone has to pay £158,000 a year in ground rent when they retire.”

Miss Knowles’ speech was heard with close attention and was strongly applauded at its end.

Related posts:

71% of leasehold house buyers used developer recommended solicitors Buyers would have ignored ground rent clauses even if we had told them, says conveyancer Rob Hailstone ITV News says 45,000 leasehold houses sold in last five years. LKP claims £300-500m new home freeholds sold every year ONS trumpets collapse in sales of new-build leasehold houses Taxpayer subsidy via Help To Buy for leasehold houses to run until 2021, MPs told

Category: APPG April 19 2017, Ground rent scandal, HomeSlider, Latest News, News, ParliamentTag: APPG, Mari Knowles, Sir Peter Bottomley

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « MP urges Commons to condemn developers selling leasehold houses with onerous ground rents. And names Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon, Bellway and Adriatic Land …
Next Post: BBC R4 You and Yours reports MPs saying leasehold houses are a ‘national con’ »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. linda

    April 26, 2017 at 6:40 pm

    We are on an estate on 60 houses 24 flats all with the doubling cause. The majority of the purchases went through with Taylor wimpey recommended solicitors, morgage advisors etc. One particular house was valued and a morgage agreed of plan by TW recommended people, when the morgage offer was no longer valid the purchases decided to go through the same process with an independant mortgage adviser ,this second independant valuation was 10% lower than the first . There is plenty of evidence ou tthere to prove over valuing of these new builds when using the developers recommended contacts .

  2. ollie

    May 3, 2017 at 1:22 pm

    Linda,

    You should send this info to Sebastian and also FCA about overvaluation of property. for mortgages on sale of new property

    And also to SFO .

    You should get the property owners on your estate organised to claim from TW.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web