• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Leasehold injustices on BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire show

Leasehold injustices on BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire show

February 2, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

By Sir Peter Bottomley

This morning I appeared on the Victoria Derbyshire show to discuss exploitation within the leasehold sector.

I joined mistreated leaseholders and property experts in an effort to raise awareness of the underhand tactics unscrupulous landowners can employ to abuse inexperienced buyers.

We can be grateful for all that Leasehold Knowledge Partnership and Campaign Against Retirement Leasehold Exploitation do to hold crooked landowners and managing agents to account.

You can watch this morning’s coverage by skipping to 14:56 and 01:07:20 on the following link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/…/b08cgsy1/victoria-derbyshire-02022017

Related posts:

Victoria Derbyshire Show reports the toll of leasehold miseries on mental health Victoria Derbyshire told ‘we must end cheating speculators in leasehold housing’ Media storm over leasehold as government declares ban on leasehold houses and rip-off ground rents Jeremy VineLeasehold on Jeremy Vine show … Leasehold debate on BBCR2 Jeremy Vine Show

Category: Latest News, News, PressTag: Sir Peter Bottomley, Victoria Derbyshire

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (43) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (31) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (32) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Gavin Barwell: ‘No excuse for leasehold houses or punitive ground rents and we will stamp them out’
Next Post: Housing minister says LEASE must be on the side of leaseholders, and promises more money »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Hollands

    February 2, 2017 at 7:14 pm

    I thought it was a poor effort of the lady who represented and excused the Conveyancers.
    She said the spiralling Grount Rents were a new phenonemon and Solicitors had not yet got used to them.
    They have in fact been around for several years, and would it not be Solicitors who draw up these devious conditions in the first place.
    I am sure those Solicitors who the Developers push their customers towards are well clued up and are part of the dodgy process.
    When they act for the unfortunate customer who is buying the new property the horrendous Ground Rent conditions are not highlighted.
    I wonder how those same Solicitors would now treat a resale. Perhaps they are now ,highlighting these conditions and advising prospective purchasers not to buy.

    • Linda

      February 2, 2017 at 8:32 pm

      Micheal that’s exactly what is happened now solicitors are advising people not to buy. So us unfortunate people are stuck with these houses with nowhere to turn Unless of course we stump
      Up the 35-40k to buy the lease ! Taylor wimpey have built prisons not houses

    • chas

      February 3, 2017 at 2:39 am

      I also watched this programme and was also unimpressed with the knowledge she had been provided or knew.

      It is obvious those involved were either kept in the dark or were attempting to reduce the full impact of these immoral happenings.

  2. Lesley Newnham

    February 2, 2017 at 7:50 pm

    What a brilliant programme, best i’ve yet seen on leasehold but it needs to be shown nationwide to have any real impact. The gentleman speaking on buying their freehold spoke for many with regard to seeing thousands of pounds in service charge disappear and nothing to show for it!!

  3. Leaseholder

    February 2, 2017 at 8:06 pm

    It’s on the main news, at last. Perhaps the law makers will look into some real reform, rather than just window dressing.

  4. Linda

    February 2, 2017 at 8:36 pm

    We are hoping to get a similar slot on the Rip of Britain show. Fingers crossed , people are talking to the producers Keep watching the face book page national leasehold campaigning for updates

  5. Horace

    February 3, 2017 at 12:22 pm

    It was the best coverage on TV I have seen of the scandals in leasehold. As a TW flat ‘owner’ I too have recently discovered (after never being advised when purchasing) that my ground rent doubles every 10 years. First doubling is in 2020 from £250 to £500… it stops when it reaches £8000 in 2060.

    Would I have bought this flat from the developer, TW, if this had been brought to my attention – of course not.

    Was I an expert on reading leases at the time of purchase (2012) – no of course not, that’s why I had solicitor (who came on the strong recommendation of TW by the way) who was happy to point things like a minor question mark over a sewage pipe and the like, but skip over the ground rent review clauses completely.

    A simple solution which would go a long way would be an enforced blanket cap on ground rents (to say £500 max for all new and existing residential properties). This would sort out the the ground rent issue for flat owners and surely would have to reduce the high quoted prices to buy freeholds (for house owners) and to extend leases too..

    I am probably being way too simplistic, but this could reduce the stress and anxiety many of us are now feeling.

    The investment companies will cry out at this – the developers should have to recompense them to some extent.. I’ll take off my rose tinted spectacles now.

    One thing is for sure – I will never be buying from TW again, nor will anyone I know unless they sort this out properly for existing leaseholders as well as the market in the future.. I had a lot of respect for them, I have none now. If they sort this out for existing leaseholders quickly maybe that respect can re-earned.

    • Jeffrey

      February 4, 2017 at 9:57 am

      Horace,

      I’m in exactly the same position as yourself. Again was encouraged to use the solicitors through Connels in Dunstable and they failed to mention that the ground rent will double every ten years. This was the back end of 2015, it wasn’t till I heard a programme on Radio 4 about this situation that I thought let me go and check the terms. If you ever see this McCann homes you are a complete shower along with Quality solicitors and Connells estate agents.

      When the time comes to sell the flat I think it’s going to be a real struggle sadly.

  6. Michael Epstein

    February 7, 2017 at 6:52 pm

    I note that Dame Katherine Mary Barker is listed as a director of Taylor Wimpey is also listed as a director of Electra Partners Equity, who have a connection with Knight Square, parent company to Firstport.

  7. Paddy Mchugh

    February 9, 2017 at 9:40 am

    The latest white paper would have more credibility if Parliament had enacted all the protection clauses in the 2002 Act.

    One area of abuse in leasehold is the absence of transparency in year end accounting for service charges due to the dark art of accrual accounting.

    How many mere mortals understand accrual accounting? It is the noble art of obscuring by summary rather than revealing by detail. Balance sheets can be made to balance even when the figures used are inaccurate. So-called ‘adjustments’ such as, er, accruals or creditors are an opportunity to mess with the final results. If this isn’t sufficient, journals adjustments can be used to massage the published figures further.

    In theory the final accounts should emerge unscathed from a balanced trial balance. The purpose of the trial balance is for every transaction, whether debit or credit, to be included and balance out. That’s the theory.

    As a rare leaseholder who understands accrual accounting, it is surprising how easy it is to create, say, an expense adjustment in one year that increases the deficit (balancing charge, please) and omit to adjust all this amount out of expenditure the next year yet arrive at balanced accounts. Must take years of study?

    Accrual accounting effectively tells leaseholders they should not expect to understand where their money has gone. Ordinary mortals would have to pay an accountant, who in turn would need to do an audit at the leaseholder’s expense, to hope to unravel the true figures. If these derive from a pooled client account, a full audit would be an interesting cost.

    It’s not the accrual format that stinks but the absence of a simple enough requirement that landlords should serve an ‘extended trial balance’ statement at the year end rather than the sanitized figures that represent only the final few columns of the trial balance, i.e. after all ‘massaging’ has already been done. Harder to hide behind.

    More ‘unreasonableness’ can be buried within accrual accounting than whether or not the gardener’s costs were a bit steep.

    • leaseholder

      February 9, 2017 at 5:11 pm

      Well said. So thats what is called ‘Accrual accounting’ or yet another simple way to fleece the leaseholder…

  8. Kim

    February 9, 2017 at 7:21 pm

    I am currently dealing with ‘ Accrual accounting’ regarding a ‘credit note’ for what I would call ‘ Double Accounting’. However , they got found out by me when I asked to inspect the accounts. Surveyors work was charged to our service charge account to the tune of £985!!!! The dimwitted directors of our freehold company did not notice this sleight of hand ( Idiots) I did and am making the agent jump through hoops to give a ‘ full and substantial explanation’ else I will report her for obtaining shareholders money by deception = Fraud= Criminal record! Let’s see how she likes them apples!!!!

  9. Kim

    February 9, 2017 at 7:23 pm

    Clarification- Surveyor survey for a completely different property was charged to our service charge. NICE TRY!

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web