• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Michael Epstein
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Michael Epstein
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / LKP saves family £25,000 over shared equity McCarthy and Stone lease

LKP saves family £25,000 over shared equity McCarthy and Stone lease

July 31, 2019 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

A shared equity one-bedroom flat at Bridewell Court, which cost £167,450 in 2008 and is now selling for £85,000, had the condition that 30% of the original sales price had to be returned to McCarthy and Stone. Or, £50,235. The company swiftly replaced this predatory condition with 30% or the re-sale price achieved.

A family selling a McCarthy and Stone retirement flat with a rip-off lease condition have been saved £25,000 after the case was taken up by LKP.

Rita May Bailey, who is now deceased, bought the one-bedroom flat at Bridewell Court, in Widnes, Cheshire in February 2008, which has a registered price of £167,450.

Mrs Bailey, a retired teacher had part-exchanged her four-bedroom freehold house for £140,000 as part of the purchase of the McCarthy and Stone flat.

The flat was a shared-equity purchase with the extraordinary condition that McCarthy and Stone receives 30% of the original purchase price from the sale proceeds.

That is £50,235.

But the flat is only under offer at £85,000.

As is not infrequently the case with retirement flats from the volume house builders, re-sale values at Bridewell Court have collapsed in the decade since it was built.

The price of £85,000 appears consistent with other re-sales at Bridewell Court (see below).

This means that Mrs Bailey’s family could anticipate around £25,000 proceeds from the sale of their mother’s flat, after estate agent and legal fees.

The rip-off lease condition opens up the intriguing possibility that, were the property to sell for less than £50,235, Mrs Bailey’s family, theoretically, could actually end up in debt after the sale of an asset.

McCarthy and Stone’s part-exchange arrangements were criticised in a Channel 4 Dispatches programme in 2012.

Mrs Bailey’s family is also concerned to discover that their mother used unfamiliar solicitors in Warrington for this transaction and that they were recommended by McCarthy and Stone.

LKP raised the issue with McCarthy and Stone chief executive John Tonkiss, copying in the then Communities Secretary James Brokenshire and the MP chairs of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform who are also the patrons of LKP:

Sir Peter Bottomley,
Jim Fitzpatrick,
Sir Ed Davey.

Within 24 hours, McCarthy and Stone agreed to drop its demand for 30% of the original sales price.

It provided the following statement to LKP:

“This shared equity plan was offered between 2007 and 2008 to a small number of purchasers.  It helped them to enjoy a property better-suited to their needs along with significant on-site support and companionship that comes with retirement living.  These purchasers could not have afforded to experience this lifestyle without the benefit of this shared equity plan.

“However, we recognise that in this instance the terms of the plan have become unfavourable and we are happy to accept a reduction in the amount due.  We will contact [Mrs Bailey’s daughter] to discuss this further. 

“All shared equity plans offered since then by the new owners and management of McCarthy & Stone, who were appointed following the company’s pre-packaged administration in 2009, are based on market value at the point of resale. 

“It is disappointing to see any development fall in value.  Bridewell Court was selling during the 2008 housing recession and this had a major impact on long-term values.  We have contacted First Port, who manage the development, to see if they can comment further.  

“Since 2010, we provide our own managing agents in all new developments who deliver care and support for our homeowners.  We also remain as the landlord on all new schemes.  Along with providing larger and better designed apartments, this helps maintain the long-term quality and value of our new developments.  We are pleased that c.70% of our managed apartments increase in value on resale.

“In 2017, we launched a new in-house re-sales operation to further support our customers and their families when they come to sell.  We find that high street estate agents are typically unable to effectively market and value specialist retirement properties. 

“Our Resales operation can properly explain the retirement living lifestyle to new customers and consequently they are seeing a healthy increase in average resale prices.”

LKP has asked McCarthy and Stone how many of its retirement properties have this lease condition and whether it has contacted current owners with these lease terms to inform them that they will now apply to the price on sale.

Below are the re-sale prices achieved at Bridewell Court from the Land Registry:

Apartment 10
2016-08-26 £73,500
2007-05-31 £129,450Apartment 11
2007-04-27 £134,450Apartment 14
2015-07-17 £95,000
2009-04-22 £125,000
2005-08-12 £164,950

Apartment 15
2015-05-08 £88,000
2005-08-12 £138,708

Apartment 16
2016-07-29 £100,000
2011-12-05 £107,500

Apartment 17
2015-11-20 £83,000
2006-05-15 £138,193

Apartment 19
2019-04-18 £80,000
2005-09-23 £134,575

Apartment 20
2016-07-15 £100,000
2013-04-08 £110,000
2008-03-28 £185,950

Apartment 21
2015-10-09 £85,000
2011-10-28 £118,000
2005-08-30 £150,950

Apartment 23
2016-06-17 £70,000

Apartment 24
2018-03-09 £67,000
2009-11-12 £115,000
2005-11-24 £137,052

Apartment 26
2015-07-24 £73,000
2007-08-31 £129,535

Apartment 28
2019-01-17 £64,000
2011-09-05 £100,000

Apartment 33
2014-08-29 £100,000
2006-09-21 £172,450

Apartment 34
2012-08-23 £90,000
2008-05-09 £155,950

Apartment 35
2016-06-03 £88,000
2008-08-29 £164,950

Apartment 40
2015-12-01 £73,000
2007-04-27 £123,950

Apartment 42
2011-12-20 £70,000
2007-05-11 £142,693

Apartment 44
2017-07-14 £77,000
2007-08-29 £139,950

Apartment 49
2016-05-24 £72,500
2009-10-21 £117,500
2005-08-26 £122,950

Apartment 5
2019-02-01 £83,000
2016-11-18 £81,000
2011-12-15 £95,000
2005-08-26 £122,950

Apartment 6
2014-03-17 £80,000
2008-03-06 £135,450

Apartment 8
2018-12-12 £80,000
2008-08-22 £134,450

Apartment 9
2019-03-22 £70,000
2005-08-26 £119,693

Related posts:

McCarthy and Stone and Churchill: are you blackmailing government over the ground rent ban and is your business model broken? Asks BBC R4 MoneyBox McCarthy and Stone: Ground rents are not the future of retirement housing Default ThumbnailMcCarthy and Stone replies to Dispatches exposé Will hedge-funders clean up in £500 million McCarthy and Stone float? Our ground rents are fair, says McCarthy and Stone (even though they go up to £600 and are for no service whatsoever)

Category: Latest News, McCarthy and Stone, NewsTag: Bridewell Court, John Tonkiss, McCarthy and Stone

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (33) APPG (34) ARMA (77) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (31) Cirrus (26) Cladding scandal (54) CMA (27) Commonhold (48) Countryside Properties plc (27) FirstPort (30) Forfeiture (28) Grenfell cladding (54) Ground rents (40) Help To Buy (29) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (29) Justin Bates (33) Justin Madders MP (52) Katie Kendrick (32) Law Commission (53) LEASE (64) Leasehold Advisory Service (60) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (43) Martin Boyd (65) McCarthy and Stone (38) National Leasehold Campaign (35) Persimmon (46) Peverel (61) Redrow (27) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (27) Roger Southam (45) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (52) Sir Peter Bottomley (174) Taylor Wimpey (100) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (31) The Times (28) Vincent Tchenguiz (38) Waking watch contracts (38) Will Astor (27)
Previous Post: « Estate of leasehold campaigner Nigel Wilkins leaves £10,000 to LKP
Next Post: Elderly Accommodation Counsel says ‘recent retirement flat resales have increased in value’ »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Loveridge

    August 2, 2019 at 11:32 am

    You need to name and shame the solicitors that acted, so that other potential victims can be warned to avoid them. If it hadn’t been for `compliant’ solicitors many of these leasehold scandals could have been avoided.

  2. RBM

    August 2, 2019 at 9:02 pm

    I assume there is a typo in the last phrase of this story, and it should be 30% of the sale price.

  3. Michael Epstein

    August 4, 2019 at 9:26 am

    Clearly the dream can easily become a nightmare!
    Sales of new build McCarthy & Stone developments are experiencing somewhat of a downturn. This is not going to be helped whilst other retirement developers can sell their developments without the imposition of ground rents on leaseholders(a charge for absolutely nothing other than to increase income for McCarthy & Stone)
    So if sales are falling, other means of offloading flats needs to be found.
    Hence the drive towards shared ownership or rental.
    Disturbingly McCarthy & Stone refer to attracting institutional property investor trusts as investors in such properties.
    So could it be that a rented flat is no longer owned by McCarthy & Stone, but by an “investor”?
    The more rentals in a development the harder it becomes for residents to take control if they are unhappy with costs or quality of management. More rentals impact on re-sale prices.
    The phrase used by McCarthy & Stone a a way to enhance income “Opening up new developments for wider community use” must be a cause of concern especially if the development has a gym or swimming pool?
    It is also disturbing to find that McCarthy & Stone intend for their management division to generate 5% of their income.
    Remember the sad history of a previous incarnation when McCarthy & Stone were associated with Peverel/Firstport? The price fixing, the overcharging, the poor service? the fatal fire at Gibson Court? All for the sake of revenue generation?
    That, Peverel/Firstport survived was in a good part because they were “granted” leaseholds on house manager’s flats which they promptly mortgaged and subsequently sold.
    To this very day neither McCarthy & Stone nor Firstport have ever offered an explanation as to how these leases came to be gifted o Peverel/Firstport?
    So in the current circumstances if I were to be asked would I buy a McCarthy & Stone flat in a retirement development (I will answer anyway in case I am not asked?) I would answer No!. At least until the retirement sector is cleaned up, with residents having much more control and not being left so vulnerable. Whilst this type of living has much to commend it, ownership still represents very poor value for money.
    However this is one over riding reason for my decision not to recommend a purchase.
    Many will be familiar with the very well publicised failings of Peverel/Firstport? Indeed McCarthy & Stone sacked them from all the developments they were able to which were the developments that the freeholds had not been sold off. They now manage the newer developments themselves as McCarthy & Stone rightly recognised the reputational damage being caused by Peverel/Firstport management.
    So who has McCarthy & Stone appointed as their CEO?
    Step forward Mr Paul Lestor.
    Mr Lestor the former CEO of Knight Square (parent company of Peverel/Firstport)

  4. MISS JAS HENDERSON

    August 5, 2019 at 6:32 pm

    Absolutely very well done
    I also believe in naming and shaming solicitors i.e
    J.B.Leitch who is the corrupt First Port choosen solicitors springs to mind!!

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2021 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at no charge by www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web