Leasehold Knowledge Partnership

The registered charity for leaseholders

Menu
  • Home
    • Site map
    • Archive of posts by category
  • What is LKP
    • Privacy and Data Protection Statement
    • Site map
  • HELP FORM
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Cladding crisis
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Leasehold Valuation Tribunal
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Accreditation
    • Accredited Companies
        • Block Managers Limited
        • Clear Building Management
        • Diamond Managing Agents
        • Dixon Emerald Associates
        • HML Group
        • Home from Home
        • Home Management Group
        • JFM Block & Estate Management
        • Jones Associates Letting & Management
        • Norwich Residential Management
        • Premier Block Management
        • Red Rock Property Management
        • Sapphire Property Management
        • Town & City Management
        • Urang Property Management
        • Vestra Property Management
  • Fighting back
      • Lease Extension
      • Q&As
      • Right to buy freehold
      • Commonhold
      • Bottomley blasts leasehold crimes on video
      • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
      • Tribunal triumphs … and defeats
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Right To Manage
      • Video
      • Find MP … and see how many leasehold voters
      • LEASE: what’s the point?
      • Pensioners win £68,500
      • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
      • Insurance racket
      • Local authority leasehold
      • Remember to extend your lease
      • St George’s wins £1 million
      • Leasehold law: the reforms
  • Sub-letting
  • Press
  • Contact
  • Parliament
      • Communities Select Committee
      • APPG
      • APPG December 14 2016
      • Commons Debate 20/12/16
      • APPG April 19 2017
      • APPG July 5 2017
      • APPG December 14 2016
  • Right To Manage
  • Lease Extension
  • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Louie Burns
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Michael Epstein
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Latest News / Quadrangle House residents seek to regain control of their RTM

Quadrangle House residents seek to regain control of their RTM

December 3, 2014 By admin

Quadrangle House is managed by a wobbly RTM, but at least it has more than one director (who was also the property manager)

Quadrangle House is managed by a wobbly RTM, but at least it has more than one director (who was also the property manager)

The residents of Quadrangle House in Stratford east London last week chose a number of directors for their right to manage company.

They were seeking to end the anomaly that the only director has been Dudley Joiner, owner of Team Property Management, which manages the site.

His Right To Manage Federation, which is not a federation but a commercial RTM facilitator, took Quadrangle House to right to manage in 2010.

Two residents also sat on the board of Quadrangle RTM, but they sold their properties this year leaving Mr Joiner, who is not a leaseholder, as the sole director as well as the property manager.

Matters have gone seriously awry with the Quadrangle House RTM to the point that it only has around 36 members in a site of 102 flats (The Quadrangle, Onyx Mews and Topaz House).

The RTM members meeting on November 25 was to choose new directors. Although only 23/24 individuals attended, this represented two thirds of the right to manage membership.

It was immediately disputed whether the members could elect new directors at the meeting, as they believed was their right, or simply offer names who would be nominated directors by Mr Joiner.

He argued that as no notice for a resolution was given – which under the Companies Act would allow those unable to attend to vote by proxy – the new directors would have to be appointed by him, as the sole remaining director.

However, Mr Joiner declined to appoint directors who were withholding service charges.

Writing to LKP, he said: “Seven new directors were nominated and it was agreed at the meeting that these persons would be appointed to the board subject to the caveat that they should not be in breach of their leases or in arrears of service charge.

“I am advised that two of the nominees are in serious arrears of service charge and on that basis will not be appointed.”

It would appear that Quadrangle RTM therefore has five new directors who will meet with Mr Joiner on December 8.

Hopefully this will be the start a harmonious new chapter in the management of Quadrangle House.

The unsatisfactory situation of Mr Joiner being the sole director has now ended, but it is urgently required that the residents now breathe life into their RTM.

Decisions affecting 102 leaseholders are being taken by a meeting of 20-odd people, and the membership of only around 36 members of the RTM is not desirable.

It is, of course, a concern that Mr Joiner is still a director of the Quadrangle House RTM, four years after he took the site right to manage with his RTMF hat on, as well as owning the appointed property management company, Team.

The conflict of interest here is obvious.

However, given the feeble leaseholder input and the reluctance of a fair number of them to pay service charges, this unfortunate situation may have come about owing to circumstances rather than design.

Furthermore, Mr Joiner has only been the sole director since September, when the last leaseholder director sold up.

The bottom line for residents is that if Quadrangle House RTM cannot sort itself out, the site might be better off seeking a court appointed managing agent.

That would be an admission of failure at a site where the leaseholders are empowered.

It must be acknowledged that Mr Joiner’s RTMF has done a lot of good by taking around 250 sites through the right to manage process. About 70 of these have been retirement sites.

(LKP has criticised Mr Joiner for seeking to take to the Court of Appeal – with all the risks involved – the failed RTM application for Elim Court, a retirement site in Plymouth.)

It is a further frustration to Mr Joiner that his nemesis Joseph Gurvits, of rival Y & Y Property Management, – from whom the RTMF has liberated a number of sites in property tribunal clashes – is being kept informed of the situation at Quadrangle House and attended a meeting with the residents.

Indeed, Mr Gurvits has accused LKP of hypocrisy in not reporting the problems at Quadrangle House as it does not demonstrate a successful example of right to manage.

As this is the second article we have published on the Stratford site, that is obviously without grounds.

The best course for the leaseholders of Quadrangle House is to introduce transparency, acknowledge past errors and start sorting them out. Primarily, by signing up new RTM members.

Related posts:

Dudley Joiner: Not relevant that I was disqualified from being a company director for 7 years Pensioners tell Dudley Joiner to give them back their £27,000 sinking fund Only one director of Quadrangle House RTM … and he is the property manager Right to manage promoter calls it a day at Quadrangle House Dudley Joiner’s Team Property Management made insolvent by Quadrangle House RTM

Filed Under: Latest News, News, Quadrangle House, Right To Manage Federation, RTM Tagged With: Dudley Joiner, Joseph Gurvits, Quadrangle House, Right To Manage Federation, Team

Contact LKP

Need help?

LKPhelp2The leasehold game is weighted against ordinary home-owning leaseholders, who aren’t professional players. LKP was set up to redress the balance, to help you win your disputes or at least avoid disasters.

If you have a leasehold problem, you can email sok@leaseholdknowledge or take a chance on calling 07808 328 230.

Or fill out this form, which ensures that you provide the essential information.

LKPnewsletter3

Professional services

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders. Click on the logos for company profiles.

Law

Right to manage

Lease extension / enfranchisement


capitalleasehold6-9ins

Insurance

Landscaping

limetree

LKP Managing Agents

Big managing agents are big because they have got business from developers or large-scale freehold owing companies. Doubtless they are very obliging.

Not a single one is big through consumer choice.

Managing agents accredited to LKP want business from leaseholders. Many are former leaseholders.

All have signed undertakings of good practice and have provided extensive references … from leaseholders.

They can also hand-hold leaseholders through right to manage at minimal cost.

Contact Sebastian O’Kelly at LKP for further details: sok@leaseholdknowledge.com, 07808 328 230

Please click on logos for link and details

Comments

  1. Insider says

    December 3, 2014 at 3:52 pm

    The standard RTM Mem and Arts say there must be two directors in place “to make any decison” and so how has Mr Joiner been running the company?

    All very odd.

  2. Michael Epstein says

    December 3, 2014 at 4:44 pm

    Fortunately for the long suffering leaseholders, they now have the option of using the mediation service offered by the Leaseholder Association.
    I can’t remember who is behind the association. Doubtless someone will remind me!

  3. Gavin Lee says

    December 3, 2014 at 5:03 pm

    It is good that the leaseholders are now taking an interest in the running of their building that is how it should be and no doubt the main reason behind the RTM in the first instance.

    • A Quad Leaseholder says

      December 10, 2014 at 2:33 pm

      Spot on!

  4. Dudley Joiner says

    December 3, 2014 at 5:18 pm

    Insider is incorrect. An RTM Company is no different to any other private company. It only needs one director. However it is accepted this is not ideal.

    In reply to the last post, Quadrangle leaseholders are not ‘suffering’. They were under Peverel when nothing was done. As explained in an earlier post, the leaseholders currently ‘complaining’ are for the most part owners that have large service charge arrears. It is not in the interests of leaseholders as a whole for the Quadrangle to be controlled by individuals who are in blatant breach of their lease.

    As the CMA have just reported, RTM does work and most RTM estates have a higher satisfaction rate. Our objective is to achieve this outocme for the Quadrangle House.

  5. martin says

    December 4, 2014 at 11:54 am

    It looks as if a large number of leaseholders at Quadrangle have been a bit silly. Having gone to all the effort of starting an RTM it seems far too many have sat back and let others get on with the work.

    The only people hurt by those who are not paying service charges are themselves and their fellow leaseholders. The agent can only ever work with the money that is paid in. There is no magic piggy bank, so it does not take much to guess what will happen to property values if the site continues to run down …

    Anyway, well done to those who have now stepped forward as directors. While we criticise Dudley for allowing himself to be left as the sole director (and the delicate issue of appointing himself, through Team, to manage the place), the leaseholders should understand that without him this RTM site may well have failed.

    We were contacted by a leaseholder earlier this year whose RTM had collapsed because nobody wanted to take on the work of being a director. Once an RTM comes to an end, the landlord takes over the site again with his choice of agent, which will almost certainly undo all the reasons why the leaseholders formed the RTM in the first place.

    The bad news is when an RTM fails the residents have to wait at least 4 years before they can start again. Unless the leaseholders can think of a very good reason to the contrary, they are automatically excluded from applying to become an RTM within that period.

    Under schedule 6 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 it is clear “that right has been so exercisable but has ceased to be so exercisable less than four years before that time”.

  6. Insider says

    December 4, 2014 at 4:41 pm

    The standard RTM Mem & Arts for RTM Companies say this:

    Quorum for directors’ meetings
    16.—(1) At a directors’ meeting, unless a quorum is participating, no proposal is to be voted on,
    except a proposal to call another meeting.
    (2) The quorum for directors’ meetings may be fixed from time to time by a decision of the
    directors, but it must never be less than two, and unless otherwise fixed it is two.
    (3) If the total number of directors for the time being is less than the quorum required, the
    directors must not take any decision other than a decision—
    (a) to appoint further directors, or
    (b) to call a general meeting so as to enable the members to appoint further directors

    This seems to limit a sole directors ability to make decisons to appointing other directors or calling a meeting.. Would it enable a sole director to appoint a managing agent?

  7. AM says

    December 6, 2014 at 11:37 am

    That the residents are in arrears is a contrived argument.

    Article 19 of the model articles manages conflicts of interest. They are prohibited from involvement in that aspect of a board’s activities and decision-making.

    Perhaps it is their frustration that has led to their withholding service charges. It is presumptuous, even arrogant, to state that they are therefore unfit to hold office.

    No agent should feel that he has a moral duty or divine right to retain control. His destiny is in the residents’ hands, a process that in this case the agent engineered.

    The agent is free to resign if arrears make management untenable, or with his out-going director’s hat on he can say as much and warn all members.

    One should ask why those “substantially in breach” are not already holding county court summons, or why new owners have not been invited or encouraged to join while under the agent’s stewardship. Even if there is good reason, agents have to accept that loss of confidence is a factor and step back gracefully.

    It is foolhardy to accept the model articles as it allows any person to hold office.

    Any future client should insist that where a first director is appointed, that his/her retirement is specified, and the appointment of a residents’ board is achieved by a certain time or stage.

    Further, office should be restricted to members, and all officers retired automatically or by rotation. This works for most RTM Co and stops people getting entrenched and hard to hold to account. They have to be voted back in, and hey, whats one meeting of everyone once a year?

    Mr Gurvits may have a point but not for the reasons he states, based on the article.

    This seems an example of a scheme being hijacked by its agent or resident apathy, until now.

    Too often residents want change but “Be a director? Oh no … no, no, no!”

    Which is why in the past I have recommended appointment of trustees/ trustee directors ala manager appointment to avoid failures of RTM.

  8. A Quad Leaseholder says

    December 10, 2014 at 2:30 pm

    It is a shame that this article has been published including alleged minutes of a meeting that was produced by Mr Joiner who was not the appointed minute taker of said meeting and whose ‘notes’ are not approved by the new Board of Directors as minutes of that meeting. However it serves to indicate what leaseholders, who could be bothered to fight, have been going through these last few years. We, it appears, have no rights but to do as we are told…like naughty children.

    How does a champion of RTM comes in and take over? Simple it appears – as most leaseholders just do not engage with these issue. Just like this somewhat inaccurate article can be written about the situation. Who do you turn to when you have been so badly let down? It seems that we should just pay up and shut up!

    If you are interested to learn a bit more about our plight, please read on…

    Yes, we were unhappy with the costs and poor service from Peverel. We wanted value for money. After great effort a ‘Tenants’ Association’ (50+% flats signed up), recognised by Peverel was formed, met and elected 6 members to steer and form the RTM. So talk of current numbers / representation out of 105 properties is just a distraction…unless efforts are made to maintain or increase membership!

    We foolishly took The RTM Federation’s word that they were non-profit making and there to help us and not themselves. A leasehold wanted to start her own management company. I told her she would have to tender at the appropriate time – just like anyone else, but directed her to Mr Joiner for advice. The next thing to happen was an information embargo. We were completely excluded from information on the progress to acquire RTM. Efforts were futile – deflected with reasons including that it was to prevent leaks of plans back to Peverel.

    I believe OUR RTM venture was seen as cash cow. But then I am just a stupid leaseholder so whom am I to know what really went down!

    There was no democratic process that I am aware of that led to Mr J being a Director of our RTM. Through our efforts we eventually found out that he was. There was no democratic process which led to the signing of a 2 years with 6 months break clause contract – again we eventually found that out too. At a meeting, where thankfully Mr Gurvits was present and had copies of emails to prove it, attempts were made to deny the type of contract that we were lumbered with. We had to go to Companies House website to learn who were Directors and when.

    Should we not learn from Mr Gurvits’ experiences / knowledge of how we were now being duped?

    We had no say in the conflict of interest appointments.
    We were sent service charge demand on the basis that it’s 15% on top of what Peverel charged. Great accounting!
    There has been numerous requests for proper accounts.
    The roof still leaks, there are still buckets collecting drips, the communal carpet areas still look stained / dirty etc. etc!
    This year we’ve seen draft accounts, met to amend them and seen nothing since. But we’re told that the accounts have been done.

    Some of us who have refused to pay all of the Service Charge demand feel that they have a moral & legal right to do so given the circumstances in which our RTM has been hijacked. If someone puts a gun to my head, should I pull the trigger?
    Is it wrong to set funds aside in an escrow account whilst disputes drag on?
    Does owing two months instalments represent ‘substantial’ non-payment?
    Is it wrong to withhold payments pending accurate accounts?

    Those of us who are openly withholding payments – and not for personal gain – can be account for and now that new Directors have been elected (awaiting confirmation that appointments made at Companies House), have or are addressing that issue. Yes, there are always wilful non-payers irrespective of circumstances. But lets not mix up the two.

    We might not have had money to throw at our plight but had none of us persevered with protesting, somehow keeping positive hope for what is true and right to win through in the bitter end, we would not have had the success we have recently won.

    Leaseholders at The Quadrangle went for RTM because THEY wanted the right to manage in order to improve their lot which means improved cleaning & maintenance & reduced service charges – not because they ever expected an abuse of trust or to be overtaken or treated in this way.

    We are grateful for all the positive support.

    • martin says

      December 13, 2014 at 5:13 pm

      A quad leaseholder. We have been critical of RTMF for allowing the leaseholders to let things get to the position were none of you wanted to stand as directors. But if you’re now going to invent some revisionist view of events and claim the site was hijacked many of the readers will see through your claims.

      Hopefully now you have new directors the problem will be resolved. As I mentioned above had Mr Joiner also stood down your RTM would now be dead..

      Your understanding of how leasehold property management works is a little wrong. It often happens when an RTM starts the previous agent does not leave the site in the best condition and you have to spend money in order to get things back on track.. Rather than complain some of you should have been finding out what was happening and why.

      If you think the service charges wrong you should still pay and then take the RTM to the Tribunal – better still ask the Tribunal to mediate the matter it costs a lot less.. There is no mechanism for you to choose to make a part payment based on what you think is reasonable.

      By keeping back your money you do nothing other than hurt yourself and your fellow leaseholders and ensure there is no money to do the things you all want to happen – money to keep the site working only comes from the service charges. It does not take too many people keeping money back before the site becomes crippled.

      Many readers will also smile at the idea you should see Mr Gurvits of all people as a sage advisor. Look in the search bar for cases where his name appears or look at the Tribunal records.

      .

  9. AM says

    December 15, 2014 at 3:44 pm

    I would add to Martin’s post that there is no obligation to step back in on the freeholder. While it might serve their commercial interests to do so they may not , especially if the RTM has left a “right mess”. Readers should not think that if the worst comes the freeholder will take it on, they may not.
    I know that some may feel that no management might even be better than some freeholders and agents tender mercies 🙂

  10. AM says

    December 15, 2014 at 3:50 pm

    DJ may be referring to co option, where directors are invited by the present board to join. If his argument that the notice nominations and resolutions were invalid, then the magnificent seven can requisition an EGM to call for their appointment correctly, and under special notice remove DJ.

    it would be sensible for proxies to contain a voting resolution to “appoint Mrs A as a director Yes No Abstain, Mrs A having been nominated by Miss B ..etc”, and therefore members or shareholders can vote specifically.

    Any decent company secretarial service can assist with drafting this.

LKPnewsletter3

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Essential reads

  • Sir Peter Bottomley
  • Martin Paine
  • Roger Southam
  • LKP full archive
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500
  • Benjamin Mire
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Sean Powell
  • Tchenguiz
  • West India Quay
  • Essential guide to lease extensions
  • Forfeiture
  • Press
  • Right to manage and taking control

News archive

Does Li Ka-shing own your Adriatic freehold, or Hutchison Whampoa, or billionaire Frank Sixt, or Astor? Only Long Harbour knows, and it’s not saying …

The secretive Long Harbour fund came under further scrutiny today, with an article in The Times on leasehold house owners in the north-west mounting a collective challenge for their freeholds. But who owns these freeholds, where the beneficial ownership is hidden behind nominee directors of a company secretary group headquartered in Jersey? Families challenge Long […]

Families challenge Long Harbour for freeholds to Bellway leasehold houses, The Times reports

Seventy families in Ellesmere Port in Cheshire are locked in a battle to gain the freeholds to their Bellway homes that were sold off to William Waldorf Astor’s secretive Long Harbour fund, The Times reports today. Katie Kendrick, co-founder of the National Leasehold Campaign and LKP trustee, has organised her neighbours to demand the freeholds. […]

Cladding victims now being hit by insurance hikes, reports BBC R4 You and Yours

By Harry Scoffin The cladding crisis has rippled through the insurance market, with leasehold tenants in dangerous apartment buildings “being hammered” by “inflated bills”, BBC Radio 4’s You and Yours programme was told yesterday. Lessees of flats in Birmingham’s Islington Gates, a mixed-use development with 144 properties wrapped in Grenfell ACM (aluminium composite material), claim […]

Grenfell United link up with leaseholder groups to protest cladding crisis and warn next government of Grenfell 2

By Harry Scoffin Survivors of the Grenfell Tower fire have this week joined forces with leaseholders stuck in privately-owned blocks clad with deadly combustibles, telling the major party leaders of their “deep and grave concern that a Grenfell-like fire is going to occur again”. In a letter sent on Tuesday to Boris Johnson, Jeremy Corbyn […]

Martin Lewis, the Money Saving Expert, challenges party leaders over leasehold scandal

By Harry Scoffin Consumer affairs champion Martin Lewis (above) has challenged the major party leaders to explain their policies on leasehold as part of an online election debate. Election 2019: The MSE Leaders’ Debate It’s the biggest consumer decision most will make in 2019. While it’s important to factor everything in, voting to choose who […]

Would you want your former Prudential pension invested in Tchenguiz ground rents by Rothesay Life? FT reports concerns

The Financial Times has reported concerns about pensions invested by Rothesay Life in the ground rent portfolio of Vincent Tchenguiz. Rothesay Life has loans of some £1.7bn to the Tchenguiz interests, which are secured against ground rents that are paid annually by residential leaseholders. UK regulator under fire over £12bn annuity deal The UK’s Prudential […]

Why AN14 is making your cladding flat impossible to sell

By Martin Boyd A growing number of leaseholders are discovering that selling their flat has become more difficult. Prospective buyers need to obtain a valuation for their lenders. Now, on thousands of homes, this may mean they need something called an ‘Advice Note 14’ (AN14) report and it many cases these reports do not exist! […]

Supreme Court blocks enfranchisement ploy that seems to be pure enrichment

The legal somersault that is lease enfranchisement – the right of a private individual compulsorily to acquire the property (the freehold) of someone else – has come under the scrutiny of the Supreme Court. Hautford Limited owned the lease of a six storey building, which could be either residential or commercial depending on the consent […]

‘You weren’t mis-sold your leasehold house and I am keeping my £45m bonus’, is the message of Persimmon CEO to Bluebell Meadow

Persimmon fatcat says he isn’t going to hand over freeholds at Bluebell Meadow … Even though taxpayers through Help To Buy subsidised these flawed purchases, which also helped make him a multimillionaire Persimmon CEO David Jenkinson, who received a controversial bonus of £45 million which saw his predecessor sacked, has said he will not be […]

Taxpayers funding two leasehold houses a day in 2019 through Help To Buy … despite government saying THREE times they should be banned

By Harry Scoffin Almost two years on from the announcement of a ban on the sale of new-build houses as leasehold tenancies, developers are continuing to cash in on the practice. According to government figures published yesterday, the first half of 2019 has seen Help To Buy equity loans taken out on 395 leasehold houses. […]

Retirement housebuilders will only reform when they are forced to do so, Lord Best tells property conference

By Harry Scoffin Influential crossbench peer Lord Richard Best told the Homes UK conference in London’s Excel centre yesterday that retirement housebuilders need to up their game following devastating reports last week in both The Times and The Guardian. Both newspapers drew on the work of LKP’s sister organisation www.BetterRetirementHousing.com to condemn dismal resale values […]

Developers can now seize FREEHOLD homes, reports BBC R4 MoneyBox in shocking expose of ‘fleecehold’

By Harry Scoffin Tens of thousands of consumer homeowners face having their freehold houses taken off them by developers if they “fall more than 40 days behind” on estate management payments, an investigation by BBC Radio 4’s MoneyBox has found. MoneyBox reported on Saturday that the number of houses subject to restrictive ‘rentcharges’ and estate […]

Only one Grenfell cladding site in line for taxpayer handout as December 31st deadline looms, reports BBC R4 You and Yours  

By Harry Scoffin Six months on from the government declaring that taxpayers would pay to save leaseholders from ruinous Grenfell ACM cladding bills, only 1 of the 86 sites has got to the first approval stage ahead of the December 31 deadline. Despite this dismal level of progress, a Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local […]

The Liberals (no, not those ones) register ‘severe dissatisfaction’ with Tory record on leasehold

By Harry Scoffin The Liberals, once the Conservatives’ main rival in British politics and the party of government during the late 18th and early 19th centuries, have launched a blistering broadside at the Tories over leasehold inaction in its 2019 election offering. The minor party, which opposed the 1988 merger between the Liberals and the […]

‘Get leasehold done’? Boris Johnson’s Conservatives repeat 2017 pledges in manifesto

By Harry Scoffin The Conservative party will implement plans to ban the selling of houses as leasehold tenancies and slash new ground rents to zero, it was confirmed today. The policies feature in the 60-page manifesto entitled “Get Brexit Done, Unleash Britain’s Potential”, launched this afternoon in the marginal seat of Telford. On page 29 […]

A consultation for leaseholders in Wales

The Universities of Bangor, Kent, and York have been commissioned by the Welsh Government to undertake research into the sale and use of residential leaseholds in Wales. As part of this research, they have designed an online survey of leaseholders in Wales. This survey aims to find out more information about: The type of property, […]

The Times reports that families ‘lost £3 billion’ on resale of leasehold retirement flats, while developers and freehold speculators made millions

The Times today suggests that families have lost £3 billion on the resale of leasehold retirement flats between 2001 and 2015 in a series of articles that add up to a devastating investigation of the sector. Some 80 per cent of the properties sold had fallen in value, with an average loss of £38,846, the […]

Cladding victims unimpressed by Robert Jenrick on BBC1’s Question Time

By Harry Scoffin A row has broken out over building safety inaction following an appearance by Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick on BBC Question Time last night. The fourth and final question of the current affairs programme, broadcast from Bolton, centred on whether the government “has done enough to tackle unsafe cladding”. Audience member Alex Gill […]

Ground rent baron James Tuttiett gives £8,500 to the Tories (which is a bit stingy, considering …)

  James Tuttiett, owner of the ground rent fund E&J Capital Partners, yesterday showed a fine sense of civic engagement with the political process by giving £8,500 to the Conservative party. The donation comes from his entity Ashcorn Estates Limited, with assets just under £6 million, of which the two directors are James Tuttiett and […]

After ground rents and cladding … now lenders won’t touch rip-off ‘fleecehold’ properties either, BBC reports

By Harry Scoffin Mortgage lenders refusing to issue loans on freehold houses blighted by rip-off ‘fleecehold’ charges condemn families desperate to move – divorce, death, debt – to staying put. The banks’ decision now forces policymakers to bring an end to fee-generating covenants and unregulated estate management schemes, LKP trustee and National Leasehold Campaign co-founder […]

More Posts from this Category

DIrection

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Find Everything

Essential reads …

  • Ground rent scandal
  • Parliament
  • MPs’ APPG on leasehold
  • Benjamin Mire
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Oakland Court
  • McCarthy and Stone
  • Persimmon
  • Recognised Tenants’ Association
  • Cladding crisis
  • Canary Riverside
  • John Christodoulou
  • Peverel
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Charter Quay
  • Forfeiture
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Law Commission
  • Plantation Wharf
  • West India Quay
  • LEASE: what’s the point?
  • Tchenguiz
  • Sean Powell
  • Press
  • Exit fees
  • William Waldorf Astor
  • Martin Paine
  • LKP anthem
  • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500
  • Park Homes
  • Redrow
  • Retirement

Copyright © 2019 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership