A judge has authorised a London council to buy back 27 units of affordable housing sold under alleged “sham transactions”, in the culmination of a long legal battle.
The report by Inside Housing can be read here https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/high-court-orders-leaseholders-to-sell-affordable-housing-back-to-council-51450
Southwark Council will pay leaseholders an affordable housing valuation for each of the properties, which were built as affordable housing under planning agreements but were then sold outright.
Under the settlement, leaseholders of 11 of the homes in the Signal Building in Southwark will be bought for £200,000, unless they can find a registered provider of social housing that offers a higher price.
The decision is the culmination of two years of legal battles between Southwark Council and various defendants, including leaseholders, banks and London District Housing Association (LDHA).
Southwark’s claim is that homes in the 22-storey Signal Building in Elephant and Castle and other buildings in the borough – intended for shared ownership under Section 106 agreements – are not being used as affordable housing.
The council says these homes were the subject of “sham transactions” whereby buyers were found who would ‘staircase’ their share of the home up to 100% in a matter of days.
As part of the settlement, the leaseholders will be forced to undertake “a declaration that these flats are bound by the planning obligations requiring them to be used as affordable housing”.
Three of the leaseholders, who cannot afford to pay off the mortgages they took out to buy the flats, will be given a one-year grace period so that they can sue the solicitors who told them the homes were ordinary market sale properties.
Related posts:
BBC R4 You and Yours features £36,000 car crash leasehold defiance over Southwark major works scheme
Southwark: hand over £50,000 … or it may just be £15,000 in 30 months’ time
Southwark council leaseholders see major works bill slashed from £17,000 to £8,000
Southwark hosts meeting of 350 council leaseholders
Southwark litigant-in-person leaseholder faces wipe-out after £24,000 tribunal victory. Council now deploys ‘shock and awe’ QC …
Adriatic Land and other freeholders ‘acting like robbers’, Commons told
What, if any experience, have you of lifetime leases and what are the pitfalls? These are offered by Homewise and I think some other companies and seem to be a follow on from equity release schemes and retirement properties which increasingly been the subject of bad press because of their astromical and often hidden fees and charges.