• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Time for leaseholders in mixed-use sites to take control

Time for leaseholders in mixed-use sites to take control

January 14, 2022 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Lord (Stephen) Greenhalgh is the housing minister tasked with seeing through the leasehold reforms, introducing these final consultations with robust criticisms of the leasehold sector (which the sector itself has been denying for the entire 11 years of LKP’s existence).

Government launches a final consultation to gauge views on mixed-use sites and commonhold

Campaign to end the 25% commercial property bar that blocks leaseholders from wresting control from aggressive landlords

Please respond here:

Reforming the leasehold and commonhold systems in England and Wales

This consultation seeks views on reforms to the leasehold and commonhold system following recommendations in the Law Commission’s reports published in July 2020.

The government has launched a final stage consultation with a February 22 deadline to address the issue of leaseholder empowerment / commonhold at complex mixed-use sites.

It is essential that affected leaseholders respond, especially those living in prime city sites.

The consultation also addresses commonhold in shared ownership properties and the provision of information on sale of commonhold homes.

The consultation comes with a robust message from Lord Greenhalgh, the housing minister tasked with leasehold reform, who writes:

“The sad truth is that, for too many leaseholders, the dream of home ownership has become a nightmare of crippling ground rents, extra fees, and onerous conditions often imposed with little or no consultation.

“This is not home ownership in the truest sense of the word …

“We are determined to right this wrong; to reform the entire leasehold system and make it fairer as we help more people to own their own home and level up opportunity across the whole United Kingdom – our new department’s and this government’s central mission.”

LKP has long campaigned to replace the 25% commercial block on leaseholders having any say in the management of buildings with a fairer 50% rule: overwhelmingly, residential leaseholders have the greatest financial stake in these buildings and should get to control their service charges.

We also want to pay tribute to the work of leasehold campaigner Harry Scoffin, who pressed the Law Commission to accept this point in its reports that are the basis for the government’s reforms.

Leaseholders should be in no doubt that freeholders will push back hard on this point, which is why it is essential to participate in the consultation.

The revenue streams from management of prime London sites are considerable: one can see how aggressively they have been defended in the legal war of attrition at Canary Riverside, in Docklands (c.30% commercial).

And here is the same landlord, Monaco-based John Christodoulou, spending £74,560 on a legal team to block a recognised tenants association at nearby West India Quay (47% commercial):

West India Quay’s victory against £74,560 legal onslaught … for a recognised residents’ association

(At risk of being accused of lawyer bashing, this action was preceded by a legal scamp phoning the then chair on the evening before the hearing asking whether she had received his earlier letter threatening defamation – about which nothing further was heard. Bullying is seldom more blatant.)

Solicitors email at 7.41pm the evening before tribunal: Did you get our letter threatening you with libel proceedings?

The announcement of the consultation was met with an immediate mail-out by leasehold lawyers in the Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners, so assume they will be putting in some time for their freehold owning clients.

In the past, LKP has noted wryly the advice of legal firms that developers build with just over 25% commercial property: to avoid the risk of leaseholders exercising the right of first refusal to purchase the freehold and, therefore, to ramp up the value of the freehold.

‘The qualifying criteria for exercising RTM are essentially the same as those for collective enfranchisement and the landlord can again prevent the right arising by structuring the development in such a way that the premises themselves do not qualify,’ writes Nicola Muir, of Tanfield Chambers

Last autumn, Lord Young (former housing minister Sir George Young), explained how the freeholder representatives in the House of Lords lobbied for the 25% rule. Debating the current Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Bill, he explained:

“When I put the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act [1993] on the statute book, one of the most contentious issues was the exemption from enfranchisement of mixed-use buildings, with shops on the ground floor and flats above.

“After a dialogue between the two Houses, when your Lordships’ House still had a healthy representation of the country’s freeholders and the other place was concerned more with leaseholders who actually had votes, we ended up exempting properties where the commercial use was 25% or more of the total space.”

So the reform was nobbled.

The leaseholders at Charter Quay – headed by Martin Boyd, chair of LKP – found use of s.25(4) of the 1987 Landlord and Tenant Act, which allows leaseholders of a site that has had a section 24 court-appointed manager in place for two or more years compulsorily to acquire the freehold.

In spite of the fact that Charter Quay has five blocks that range from no commercial at all to 60% it was eligible.

Furthermore, and unusually, the income streams of the commercial units do not belong to the head lease, which meant that the leaseholders could buy it for £900,000. Had the commercial income been part of the head lease the price would have been eight to ten times more.

Nonetheless, the leaseholders’ action was an appalling surprise to Vincent Tchenguiz, whose British Virgin Island based Tchenguiz Family Trust ultimately owned this asset.

The leaseholders duly celebrated in July 2013 his departure as headlease and freehold owner with choirs, bands, speeches by then Cabinet minister Sir Ed Davey (an LKP patron) and a methuselah of Pol Roger champagne.

Cabinet minister celebrates Charter Quay ‘independence day’ as it breaks free from ‘monstrous companies’: Tchenguiz and Peverel

Unfortunately, there are limited set of circumstances where the 1987 Act applies and if the revenues of the commercial space belongs to the freehold or headlease the cost of buying them will often be prohibitive.

For all that, the victory at Charter Quay did establish that leaseholders could compulsorily purchase a site with considerably more than 25% commercial, and run it effectively as well.

Without recognising that it was parroting the property interests of the 1990s House of Lords, the Law Commission proposed to keep the 25% commercial rule for collective enfranchisement and commonhold conversion.

It was thanks to noisy opposition from Harry Scoffin, who frequently contributes to LKP, and leaseholders at West India Quay and Canary Riverside, that this was bumped up to 50%.

The consultation on mixed-use sites comes as the Leasehold Reform (Ground Rents) Bill goes through Parliament, ending new ground rents on new builds.

The government is also pledged to reform the process of enfranchisement valuation by abolishing marriage value, capping ground rents in the valuation calculation at 0.1% of the freehold value and prescribing rates for calculations at market value.

“Together these changes will save some leaseholders thousands if not tens of thousands of pounds,” says Lord Greenhalgh.

A secondary part of the consultation involves commonhold, and asks for views that were omitted by the Law Commission.

First, shared ownership is not available in commonhold structures, but the Law Commission recommended that it should be.

The government is wanting to make providers – typically housing associations – responsible for all repairs in an “initial repair period” of 10 years.

The consultation seeks views on this.

Second, a Commonhold Unit Information Certificate, the “CUIC”, is used in the buying and selling of commonhold title – essentially, the commonhold association needs to provide this to the seller who then passes it to the buyer as part of the conveyancing process.

There may be a fee involved here and the consultation seeks views on this and the amount that reasonably could be asked.

The issues on commonhold are tidying up measures, while the 25% commercial rule is a reform that would be of benefit to thousands of leaseholders.

Please fill in this consultation!

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reforming-the-leasehold-and-commonhold-systems-in-england-and-wales/reforming-the-leasehold-and-commonhold-systems-in-england-and-wales#basic-information

Related posts:

As new ground rents ban gets Queen’s assent, LKP urges leaseholders to echo calls to action in its submission to government consultation on the next reforms … APPG hears agony of Grenfell cladding on private sites, while Lendlease sites head to tribunal to get leaseholders to pay Law Commission doesn’t expect leasehold reform before 2020 Is Law Commission wobbly over 25% commercial exclusion to collective enfranchisement? (Let’s hope so) Affluent London leaseholders are just as likely to be kicked around as poor ones, finds the Sunday Times

Category: Charter Quay, Latest News, NewsTag: 25% rule, Canary Riverside, Charter Quay, Commonhold, Harry Scoffin, John Christodoulou, Law Commission, Lord Greenhalgh, Lord Young of Cookham, Martin Boyd, Mixed-use sites, Shared ownership, Sir Ed Davey, West India Quay, Yianis Group

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Michael Gove cladding In Gove we trust, but developers can pay cash
Next Post: Settlers Court: for the first time the Supreme Court considers right to manage. The result? Leaseholders get a battering over communal area management »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Enid

    January 16, 2022 at 6:57 pm

    Leasehold property is a way for landlords to make money from people who want to manage their own homes Leaseholders pay a lot for property, they do not really own and they continue to pay exorbitant fees for Service Charges as well as ground rent. No wonder they are so many homeless. It is in the interest of the government to change leaseholders and allow owners to have the freehold, this will encourage more people to buy their own homes and it will end homelessness.

  2. Kat

    January 20, 2022 at 11:28 pm

    Sadly I do not see any reforms to combat the way how freeholders rip off leaseholders through service charges and major works ((. Social Housing landlords as bad as the private. leaseholders ars trapped unable to splash money on solicitors, tribunals, courts to combat the problems. how the reform will help those leasholdes – not clear.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web