• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / War of attrition continues between Canary Riverside freeholder John Christodoulou and the court-appointed manager …

War of attrition continues between Canary Riverside freeholder John Christodoulou and the court-appointed manager …

December 7, 2018 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

The view from Canary Riverside is an uplifting panorama. But life at the prime Docklands site in east London has been beset with litigation with freeholder John Christodoulou, whose management was replaced by a property manager accountable to a court in 2016

Two years after the leaseholders at Canary Riverside thought that they had escaped from the clutches of freeholder John Christodoulou after they secured a court-appointed managing agent, the legal wrangling continues.

This week saw the 19th day in tribunal since Monaco-based freeholder John Christodoulou lost control of the site’s management in October 2016, when his related company Marathon Estates was ejected.

It was replaced by veteran property manager Alan Coates, a senior executive at HML Holdings plc (which is an LKP-accredited managing agent).

Mr Coates’s barrister told the tribunal that his role as the court-appointed manager is being frustrated by a series of legal stratagems including tribunal hearings racking up legal costs for the leaseholders.

On Monday, the leaseholders complained to the tribunal that:

“The landlord’s refusal to allow the manager/HML to utilise the offices, staff welfare, workroom and storage facilities located within the estate is to the detriment of good estate management and demonstrates that the landlord continues to put his own interests before those of the estate.”

These spaces of Canary Riverside were “designed to meet the operational management of the estate”, the leaseholders argued.

Instead, since the Section 24 ruling establishing Mr Coates’s appointment as the court-appointed manager, these spaces have been sublet by the freeholder, the tribunal was told.

The leaseholders claimed:

“The parties to whom the licenses have been granted are all companies related to the ultimate owner of Canary Riverside, Mr Christodoulou (Yianis). Residential leaseholders are therefore subsidising the landlord’s companies.”

Barrister Rebecca Cattermole, acting for Mr Coates, said:

“The manager is finding it extremely difficult to manage the estate properly. He doesn’t even have proper operational and office facilities.”

The Canary Riverside court-appointed manager Alan Coates is ‘finding it extremely difficult to manage the estate properly. He doesn’t even have proper operational and office facilities’, the tribunal was told

Ms Cattermole added that key parts of Canary Riverside were being “siphoned-off” in conduct “designed to ensure that the estate cannot be managed properly.”

She urged the tribunal to enable the manager to carry out the obligations of his court appointment.

“To ignore the interference with the management and simply to leave the management order as it is, you effectively bring about an end of this order.”


Why should we care about Section 24?

Court appointed management (section 24) is the only recourse for leaseholders where right to manage or enfranchisement are not possible. A S24 order should cut off a landlord’s access to the residential service charges.

The repeated litigation at Canary Riverside, a high-end mixed-use development that includes a hotel, demonstrates its shortcomings.


John Christodoulou’s barrister, Justin Bates, responded:

“This is not a matter for the tribunal. You are being drawn into the day-to-day management for which you are not suited.”

John Christodoulou, or rather his freehold owning and management entities Octagon Overseas Limited / Canary Riverside Estate Management Limited, said that Mr Coates “does not have a proprietary interest in the estate”.

Further that:

“CREM (the freeholder) is perfectly within its right to grant subleases / licences to third parties, especially as it has an obligation under the terms of the [a] Santander loan to maximise income from the estate.”

Meanwhile, Mr Christodoulou was asking the tribunal that his costs for handing over the site to the court appointed manager, and his ongoing costs for complying with the court order, be paid by the leaseholders.

Judge A.M. Vance said: “I’d say I’ve never come across a provision in a management order a clause that allows the landlord to recover the costs of complying with the management order.”

The leaseholders, meanwhile, do not think that they should be paying the freeholder to address the failings of its own management.

“Unlike enfranchisement and RTM, S24 is fault-based. A landlord should not be compensated for costs it incurs as a result of its failure to meet its statutory obligations …

“CREM’s costs of compliance have arisen as a direct consequence of their serious breaches of the lease, RICS code and legislation.

“Leaseholders have already been penalised: they have had to pay £220,000 of CREM’s legal fees despite the fact CREM lost the s24 action, and they have also borne the considerable legal costs and management fees incurred by the manager in respect of CREM’s applications to vary the order.”

The leaseholders expressed their frustration at the freeholder’s conduct since the s24 order was made.

“In March 2017, CREM removed all the furniture and equipment within the estate offices … and literally dumped them in the residential lobby. This was not the actions of a reasonable landlord seeking to comply with the order.”

This allegation was not addressed in tribunal.

The leaseholders added:

“It is apparent that debts associated with the Yianis Group companies, which include the hotel and Mr Christodoulou (Yianis), are having a significant impact on the manager’s ability to provide estate services.

“This appears to be a tactic designed to frustrate Mr Coates’s management.

“It also demonstrates that CREM / Yianis is continuing to act in its own best interests and not in the best interest of the estate and its stakeholders.”

A tribunal ruling is expected before Christmas.

We know where you live … ‘Joe Bloggs’ forced to reveal real identity by judge

A leaseholder attending as a member of the public was forced to reveal his identity and address by Judge A.M. Vance.

For the hearing, the public had to give their names twice and the leaseholder had signed his name “J. Bloggs”.

But the alias was picked up by barrister Justin Bates, acting for freeholder John Christodoulou, in the courtroom: “Sir, we have checked the leases and there is no J. Bloggs.”

In 2016 more than 100 members of the Canary Riverside residents’ association were threatened with defamation proceedings after criticisms of the management of the site.

Defamation was also alleged against the chair of the residents’ association at West India Quay, where Mr Christodoulou is also the freeholder, in 2014 immediately before a tribunal hearing where it successfully acquired recognition.

Allegations of harassment against the leaseholders have been raised in tribunals and in Parliament.

Related posts:

Battle for Canary Riverside resumes after court appointed manager steps down Canary Riverside freeholder told to co-operate with court appointed managing agent John Christodoulou minions get the boot at Canary Riverside Legal arms race as Canary Riverside freeholder seeks judicial review Billionaire John Christodoulou and his lawyer David Marsden accused of ‘little short of harassment’ of court-appointed managing agent

Category: Canary Riverside, John Christodoulou, Latest News, NewsTag: 25% rule, Alan Coates, Canary Riverside, Canary Riverside Estate Management Limited, HML Holdings, John Christodoulou, Justin Bates, Mixed-use sites, Octagon Overseas Limited, Rebecca Cattermole, Yianis

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (39) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (47) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Rectory Court slashes service charges after dumping Stonewater for right to manage LKP accredited managing agent
Next Post: For God’s sake! Now it emerges £8.3 billion Help To Buy scheme – that turned house builder executives into multi-millionaires – is not available on commonhold properties! »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Chris

    December 7, 2018 at 8:59 pm

    Keep up the pressure on the Christodoulou . Drag him back at every opportunity. The leaseholders just wish to control their own building management, not take over his empire. It`s a reasonable enough request.
    However, it`s rather controversial stance by Christodoulou, considering he presents his altruistic nature through his charity work for childen and their families.

  2. S McDonald

    December 7, 2018 at 10:23 pm

    Is there no recourse in the law for a freeholder who is acting in a malicious and deliberate manner to be removed and forced to sell their interest in a site ?

  3. chas

    December 7, 2018 at 11:58 pm

    The use of the word Vexatious litigation can be used in a FTT or County Court when costs can be awarded for wasting the courts time.

    Vexatious litigation is legal action brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.

    Is this what is happening as this man is a billionaire so can he be playing games with the Law?

  4. chas

    December 8, 2018 at 12:33 am

    John Christodoulou, the Monaco-based Freeholder at West India Quay – a prime site at Canary Wharf in London’s docklands – thought it worthwhile to spend £75,000 on a QC to attempt unsuccessfully to thwart a recognised tenants’ association. is this how the rich play games?

  5. ollie

    December 13, 2018 at 2:52 pm

    Where is the local MP ?

    Why isn’t the MP around to show backing from Parliament for the leaseholders ?

    • Michael Epstein

      December 16, 2018 at 8:23 am

      I believe the local MP is Jim Fitzpatrick (part of LKP) and one of the heroes in the fight for leaseholder justice.
      He is also a leaseholder whose development is managed by Firstport..

  6. ollie

    December 26, 2018 at 6:58 am

    We should ask Jim Fitzpatrick to take Mr Essien of Lease and Ms Heather , Housing Minister and Professor Hoskins, Law Commission to attend the Court Hearing .

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web