• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Competition and Markets Authority / OFT / Anchor Trust upsets retirement residents by allowing sub-letting – where the lease prohibits it

Anchor Trust upsets retirement residents by allowing sub-letting – where the lease prohibits it

April 5, 2013 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Woodville Grove, in Welling, Kent, where residents are deeply suspicious of Anchor’s policy to ignore the lease and allow sub-letting
Woodville Grove, in Welling, Kent, where residents are deeply suspicious of Anchor’s policy to ignore the lease and allow sub-letting

UPDATE APRIL 5, 17.51: In a statement justifying its policy, Anchor refers to the Office of Fair Trading report which stated that “terms in long leases preventing sub-letting have potential for unfairness” and that “permission [to sub-let] should not be unreasonably withheld”.  See below

A curious dispute is brewing at our sister site Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation over retirement developments owned and managed by the Anchor Trust housing association.

It has decided to allow sub-letting at these sites even where this is specifically not permitted in the lease. It says it is doing so because retirement flats are proving difficult to sell and sub-letting will relieve the costs on retirement leaseholders, or their heirs, who otherwise would have to pay full service charges on empty flats.

But Anchor’s top-down dictat allowing what in law is not allowed has infuriated residents at Anchor sites and at least three are now in ferment.

At a packed meeting yesterday at Woodville Grove, at Welling in Kent – on the outskirts of London – residents told Anchor executives of their furious opposition to the proposal

“There were bums on seats that have never been on seats at other meetings before,” said resident Barbara Little, 63, who is leading the opposition to Anchor’s new policy at the site.

Little estimates that 52 residents in the 63-flat site attended to hear Abigail Poole, of Anchor’s leasehold department, explaining the housing association’s change of heart.

Little is furious that Anchor is allowing sub-letting and – far more importantly – unilaterally ignoring the lease.

“We bought these properties on the clear understanding in the lease that sub-letting would not be allowed, and they are blatantly ignoring this.

“But if they can ride roughshod over this, what else will they do? The lease has to be a legal document or it is absolutely worthless.

AnchorSubletting“When I did some alterations work in my flat I had to pay Anchor £60 because this was a condition of the lease. Why should I pay this if we are just making things up as we go along?”

Abigail Poole told the residents that the policy meant “relaxing the rules on that clause of the lease”. But Anchor’s own leaflet to its residents makes it clear this this is a far more major step.

“Although a small amount of leases at estates allow for properties to be sublet to occupants meeting the age criteria, the majority prohibit any form of sub-letting,” it says.

Poole told the Woodville Grove residents that Anchor had been deluged by requests to relax sub-letting restrictions by leaseholders or their heirs who were unable to sell. On further questioning it appeared that nine out of 9,000 Anchor residents had actually requested this.

Upmarket Bicester House in Oxfordshire is overwhelmingly opposed to permitting sub-letting, which is not allowed under the lease
Upmarket Bicester House in Oxfordshire is overwhelmingly opposed to permitting sub-letting, which is not allowed under the lease

In December residents at grade II listed Bicester House in Oxfordshire also overwhelmingly rejected Anchor’s change of policy. The issue is now to be adjudicated by the Housing Ombudsman.

“I have asked them to investigate the fact that despite all Anchor’s assurances that a consultation process would take place, it hasn’t and has ignored their own policies,” said Stuart Barsby, a former senior police officer and chairman of the Bicester House residents’ association. Here 37 residents voted against Anchor’s policy and only four were in favour.

Hyett Orchard, in Painswick, Glos, is another site opposed to Anchor's sub-letting policy
Hyett Orchard, in Painswick, Glos, is another site opposed to Anchor’s sub-letting policy

At the Hyett Orchard site in Painswick, Gloucestershire, 85 per cent of residents are opposed to sub-letting, according to Roger Teague. In October 2011, district manager Sue Clark assured the residents that no property would be sub-let, but the policy is going ahead.

As with Bicester House, the residents are going through the Anchor redress scheme which concludes with the matter being considered – in a non-disclosed and non-binding ruling – by the Housing Ombudsman.

“Anchor’s actions have destroyed the ethos of this estate and has caused needless unpleasantness and disharmony,” said Teague.

Anchor Trust is allowing leaseholders, or their executors, to rent the properties in exchange for a fee of £175 plus VAT. This is more than double the £85 sub-letting fee at retirement developments agreed between the Tchenguiz Family Trust and the Office of Fair Trading, while the Land Tribunal has ruled that £40 plus VAT is reasonable in the non-retirement sector.

Anchorsublettingcontract-1Anyone sub-letting their apartment is to sign a form (left) from Anchor – which appears to have been drafted six months ago – stating that they understand that sub-letting is not permitted in the lease. The legal liability involved in such a document – for both the leaseholder or heir intending to sub-let and for Anchor – is an open question.

Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation has made clear that it has no issue with residents and freehold owners at individual sites agreeing to allow sub-letting. It emerged at a recent meeting between Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation and Age UK that this has been requested by leaseholders and is a symptom of the malaise in the retirement leasehold market.

The enthusiasm with which Anchor is intent on changing these private leases unilaterally does give rise to understandable suspicions: would the housing association really risk court action over this purely to assist leaseholders who cannot sell up? Or does Anchor have in mind tenants for these unsold retirement leasehold flats?

Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation has been critical of Anchor Trust, whose previous chief executive John Belcher was on the widely ridiculed salary of £391,000 per annum (the highest for a housing association chief executive). The current chief executive Jane Ashcroft is still the best paid housing association CEO, and Anchor is the largest “not-for-profit” housing association.

The Mail on Sunday reported in February 2011 that Anchor Trust sought to obtain additional revenue by keeping the interest of investing perhaps £10 million of leaseholder contingency funds. They spent £5,000 for a legal opinion on whether it would be legal to do so. The answer was “no”.

Exit fees at Anchor sites, which go into the contingency funds, are high. Little will pay 0.9 per cent of the price paid for her flat for every year that she lives there.

Anchor statement:

An Anchor spokesman said: “Where it’s reasonable to grant consent, we will do so. Any decision made takes into account the extent of reasonable local opposition from fellow leaseholders.  In all cases where consent is sought, we have a strict procedure in place to ensure that the property is only let to a suitable sub-tenant. Each case is considered on its merits.

“The £175 sub-letting fee we charge covers the cost of vetting the prospective sub-tenant, preparing the licence to sub-let and approving the sub-tenancy agreement.

“We do get requests from residents to sublet and the OFT, which has endorsed the principle that leaseholders should be able to sublet their property, said the following:

“In relation to sub-letting, we still take the view that terms in long leases preventing sub-letting have potential for unfairness under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations (UTCCRs). In our view a consumer should be able to seek permission to assign (by means of a sublet) and that permission should not be unreasonably withheld.

“We would see this as being particularly important in relation to leases in retirement properties. In some instances tenants may need to move out due to health issues (often to a nursing home), so subletting the property is an important means to pay service charges, and otherwise maintain the tenant’s investment in the property. Further, where the original tenant has died, often their heirs or estate will remain liable to pay service charges, while being ineligible to reside in the property themselves because of minimum age restrictions. In such circumstances, subletting may be the only means by which the property can provide any economic benefit to the owner. Further in circumstances where the market value of the property has fallen since the tenant purchased it, being obliged to sell rather than sublet is likely to cause significant hardship to the tenant.” 

“We strongly refute the suggestion that granting consent to sublet would result in large scale awards for damages for breach of lease. As the OFT has suggested, provisions in leases which restrict the ability to sublet are likely to be unlawful under the Unfair Terms In Consumer Contracts Regulations.”

Related posts:

Cherry Trees retirement flat hit by £9,341 sinking fund exit fee .. Default ThumbnailSub-letting: LKP trials a simple scheme that benefits all Default ThumbnailTroy Court £912 leasehold sub-letting fee cut by £400 thanks to LKP (with more to come?) Yet again! This time Adderstone told to stop loading sub-letting fees Newcastle City Council reneges on allowing residents to choose management

Category: Competition and Markets Authority / OFT, Housing associations, News, SublettingTag: Abigail Poole, Anchor, Anchor Trust, Bicester House, Housing Ombudsman, Hyett Orchard, Jane Ashcroft, John Belcher, Mail on Sunday, OFT, Woodville Grove

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (41) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « One in the Eye from LKP
Next Post: House of Lords launch for ARMA-Q on May 15 »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. joe nolan

    April 26, 2013 at 8:06 am

    I’d like to compliment Sebastian on his extraordinary efforts, on an ongoing basis , in helping leaseholders . He is a rock of fortitude surrounded on the whole by an ocean of thieving malignant management companies, lawyers, lackies, and individuals who wouldn’t know what a moral compass was if it hit them.
    Joe Nolan

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web