• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Could paying off Help To Buy loans on blighted homes force government to act over Grenfell cladding … and doubling ground rents?

Could paying off Help To Buy loans on blighted homes force government to act over Grenfell cladding … and doubling ground rents?

April 16, 2018 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

My £475,000 home with Grenfell cladding is worth £50,000. So I’ll now pay off my Help To Buy loan, please

… But taxpayers would lose millions

New Capital Quay

 

A young mother has made an intriguing intervention into the dilemma of those whose new flats are blighted with Grenfell cladding.

And it may prove a tempting get-out for those with doubling ground rents, too.

Cecile Langevin, 32, who was due to give birth to her second child last weekend, wants to move on to a larger home.

Her £475,000 flat at New Capital Quay in Greenwich – where Galliard, which built the place four years ago and owns the freehold, blames the warranty insurer NHBC for signing off the cladding – has been valued for sale at £50,000.

All the flats at the site are blighted and unsellable.

In that case, she has decided, she will pay back the 20% Help To Buy loan right now.

Expensive London flats slashed in value by Grenfell-style cladding – News – GCR

“It is like someone has taken away our life choices, our freedom,” said Cecile Langevin, 32, after hiring a surveyor to value her property in the 11-block riverfront complex, New Capital Quay in Greenwich (pictured), built by developer Galliard Homes. “And nobody is doing anything about it,” she told newspaper The Guardian, reportedly in tears.

At 20% of the market value that means she would owe £10,000.

When Mrs Langevin bought the flat in 2014 she used savings, a mortgage and a £95,000 loan under the Help To Buy scheme.

So if she pays that off now taxpayers would lose £85,000 of its loan.

Many others bought at the New Capital Quay site with Help to Buy, which Galliard was heavily promoting at the site of 950 flats.

As yet, Mrs Langevin has had no reply from Target HCA, which administers Help To Buy, beyond saying that it is a “novel” request.

“They are being evasive, because they know if they have to do this for me they have to do it for everyone who asks,” she told the Guardian.

What applies in sites blighted by cladding would also apply to the 100,000 homes caught up in the double ground rent scandal.

The government’s ill-conceived bumper subsidies to the housebuilding sector could turn out to be utterly disastrous, with taxpayers facing multi-million payouts.

Martin Boyd, trustee of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, told the Guardian:

“The blight caused by Grenfell is national and the government doesn’t seem to be too bothered about that. So far, what we have heard from Greenwich and Croydon is just the tip of the iceberg.”

Regardless of how much of the government loan she has to repay, Langevin is still subject to huge negative equity because the value of the flat has plummeted.

Related posts:

Taxpayers face £85,000 loss as Homes England accepts leaseholder can pay back loan on flat blighted by Grenfell cladding Leaseholders face £19m to £40m Grenfell cladding bills at Galliard Homes’ New Capital Quay New Capital Quay cladding may cost £7-10m, while NHBC sends in experts – and libel warning to BBC Ground rent scandal risks becoming full-blown crisis as loans are refused on blighted homes Galliard Homes ‘needs to take responsibility for what it has built’

Category: Latest News, News, PressTag: Galliard, Help To Buy, New Capital Quay, NHBC

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « McCarthy and Stone: Ground rents are not the future of retirement housing
Next Post: Law Commission sets out how it hopes to create a better deal for leaseholders – and look at alternatives »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    April 16, 2018 at 9:56 pm

    Daft Question Of The year Time?
    If you paid for a property in part using a credit card, would the credit card provider be liable under Section 75 Consumer Credit Act if the purchase was not fit for purpose?

    • Steohen

      April 17, 2018 at 10:38 am

      Section 75 of the consumer credit act limits redress to purchases up £30000

      However your point may be of assistance to those stuck with time shares where invariably payment was made by credit card

      • B

        April 23, 2018 at 4:54 pm

        Considering Leasehold today is based around a Timeshare template, then this could be an interesting angle. One nasty Property Management Co. included as part of its incorporation Do. the very words Timeshare in the same breath as Leasehold. The case laws prove what has evolved over time from 1998 onwards what can be done at source when aided by a struck off Sol, who has been given grant of audience.

    • B

      April 23, 2018 at 5:12 pm

      Here’s some food for thought, who is authorised to carry out Regulated Activities? This would be an inroad to pull them up short?

  2. Stephen

    April 17, 2018 at 10:48 am

    Section 75 limits compensation to transaction upto £75000

    Your point may be of relevance particularly to those stuck with time shares who paid on a credit card in order to get out of the door of the sale pitch

    • Stephen

      April 17, 2018 at 10:49 am

      Sorry typo £75000 should read £30000

      • Michael Epstein

        April 17, 2018 at 11:43 am

        Thanks Stephen, So Section 75 would apply to service charges presumably? In which case a part payment of a service charge by credit card (if services have not been delivered) would be covered? That could make life very interesting?

        • B

          April 23, 2018 at 4:56 pm

          Like your angle here on this

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web