• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Developers moderating their cheating makes it worse for leaseholders who are trapped, says Fiona Bruce MP

Developers moderating their cheating makes it worse for leaseholders who are trapped, says Fiona Bruce MP

July 25, 2019 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Fiona Bruce argues that developers haphazard efforts to deal with the toxic leases that they created has made matters worse for those who have already bought their properties

Commons debate, July 11 2019

The haphazard, unscrutinised – and not financially disadvantageous to them – tinkering with ground rents fiddles by developers has made it worse for those trapped by toxic leases.

This is the view of Consevative MP Fiona Bruce (Congleton) when she told the Commons:

“The fact that buyers are now being offered much better terms by developers, often on the same developments, has exacerbated their problems and left them in difficulties. They simply will not be able to sell their homes.”

She cited the example of Alison and David Rowlands, of Sandbach, who bought a Taylor Wimpey house in July 2011, with doubling ground rents starting at £289.

They were advised by Taylor Wimpey that they could buy the freehold for £5,000, but it was sold to ground rent speculators in December 2013, who now want £30,000.

The house cost £229,995 but will pay out £1,837,850 in ground rent to parasitical investors in the freehold during its 250-year lease.

“[this is] the equivalent of buying their house eight times over. They say that they feel victimised and vulnerable, and, of course, they are not alone in this situation. Government need to act as a matter of justice to help these people.

“… I have ​met Mr and Mrs Rowlands on a number of occasions. They are very genuine people—a young family seeking to settle their situation in life and become secure—and yet there they are living in their home and, as they say, feeling victimised and vulnerable.

“As far as Mrs Rowlands is concerned, this has had a very serious detrimental effect on her health.”

Related posts:

Brokenshire demanding action for 100,000 trapped in toxic leasehold homes five months ago Guardian reports misery of leasehold home owners trapped by John Lewis Partnership Pension Trust – and the Mail, Sun, Mirror and Lad Bible (any we have missed?) Taylor Wimpey’s snake oil ground rent review scheme makes toxic leases even worse: in my case, £25m worse! Views of Tory MP Crispin Blunt: Government should ‘nullify’ ground rents. End ‘feudal’ leasehold. Bring in commonhold. And stop developers’ and solicitors’ ‘unconscionable’ cheating of the naïve Default ThumbnailNo help for leaseholders trapped in unsellable homes, says government

Category: Latest News, News, ParliamentTag: Fiona Bruce MP, Taylor Wimpey

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Government is hiding behind Law Commission and CMA, says Tory MP Bob Blackman
Next Post: Industrial-scale ground rent rip-offs have turned leasehold properties into short-term tenancies, says Maria Eagle »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Niikki

    July 25, 2019 at 1:02 pm

    Good point made by Fiona Bruce. To give an example someone might want to investigate is

    Acton Gardens (W3) regeneration partnership between Countryside and L & Q housing association (charity)
    is a great example. L & Q are now in receipt of ground rents. The old ground rents double every 15 years and the new properties for sale are marketed at increasing by RPI. So housing associations do not act very charitably and are as money grabbing as any private developer.

    Why does the government still do nothing to stop these rip offs

  2. stephen

    July 25, 2019 at 2:35 pm

    If we owe the Chinese Government say £1 trillion (ie Million millions) presumably according to the logic being put out by Fiona Bruce we should offer them a bond that will pay £1000 per annum for the next billion years .

    This is the sort of ludicrous scaremongering put out by those who have no idea about the concept of the time value of money. And has the effect of undermining the real issues that need to be addressed

    • Niikki

      July 25, 2019 at 3:10 pm

      Stephen you misunderstand the point and ignored my example where L&Q are charging two different ground rents for identical flats.

      In fact the new builds now being sold in Acton Gardens regeneration site are more expensive but have lower RPI ground rents than the cheaper older flats with doubling ground rents. These facts destroy your arguments for ground rent and highlight the moral dishonesty of a system hell bent on extracting as much cash from homeowners as possible.

      Where on earth does China come in to your argument. Your arguments get more ludicrous by the day.

      • stephen

        July 25, 2019 at 3:35 pm

        Fiona Bruce states

        The house cost £229,995 but will pay out £1,837,850 in ground rent to parasitical investors in the freehold during its 250-year lease.

        This is scaremongering and to illustrate this I showed the absurdity by illustrating it with the an example of the debt we owe the Chinese

        Whatever the ground rent terms are they form part of the overall consideration the developer is looking for on the deal. Purchasers need to reflect on what that obligation is and factor it into their offer. If I want a ground rent of £5000 linked to the RPI I will not be able to sell the flat unless as a developer I lower the price of the flat by around £135k.

        If a purchaser agrees to that rent of £5k and pays £135k less for the property he has not bought a bad deal neither has it got a bargin. But it is wholly reasonable to expect that purchaser to pay the £5k rent as it was part and parcel of the deal

        What has happened is that when the rent is a few hundred a year, nobody thinks about about and knowing that people do not think about it some developers have slipped in clauses which mean that obligation to pay the rent is more significant than it appears.

        My proposal has always been that the Net Present Value of the Rent should be clearly shown next to the premium paid for the lease and the interest rate used in the calculation of the NPV to be set by the Government . In that way the purchaser can appreciate the cost of the obligation of paying that rent going forward

        • Ian

          July 25, 2019 at 8:01 pm

          The point you are missing is the fact that it does not matter what the net present value is not clearly shown . What should be clearly shown and fully explained is that these people who thought they were buying a home did not realise they were only leasing it and the developers have exploited this by duping the buyers/victims into this by getting them to use their selected solicitors so wether things were clearly out makes no difference if you do not understand this legal jargon and this is what the majority of these people think is the reason they are paying for the solicitor to decipher. The fact that the solicitor is in on the scam with the developer is the reason why it isn’t made clear !

        • Tony

          July 27, 2019 at 4:58 pm

          “The house cost £229,995 but will pay out £1,837,850 in ground rent to parasitical investors in the freehold during its 250-year lease”

          The statement includes figures i.e. cold hard facts.

          I cannot fathom how you can claim facts are scaremongering – that’s nonsensical.

  3. Michael Epstein

    July 25, 2019 at 3:51 pm

    Nickki,
    In defence of him, Stephen does not misunderstand your point?
    He is merely defending the indefensible!

  4. Chris

    July 25, 2019 at 6:21 pm

    It’s time these leeches realised that they need to be customer focussed and buy back the freeholds they sold on without telling their ‘customers’. I’m so annoyed at how they have taken everyone for a ride and at the moment gotten away with it. The CMA has got the evidence and they should be able to see from that that the developers are mis-selling properties and need to be held accountable.

    Not sure what Stephen is smoking but it must be illegal…..

  5. J

    July 25, 2019 at 6:41 pm

    What happened to – like a house, buy a house, own a house and sell a house because of its quality – without all the complex man made ‘deals’ that simply generate income streams to developers and not much more.

  6. KB

    July 25, 2019 at 8:09 pm

    Stephen focuses on a single particular quote in the text, but completely misses the point of the article and the leasehold scandal in general Far from scaremongering, the leasehold sector is infested with so many players miss-selling and profiteering on an unbelievable scale. Thankfully many of the scams have been exposed and are now under scrutiny by the CMA.

  7. Denise clark

    July 26, 2019 at 9:11 pm

    Stephen, you don’t seem to have grasped the fact that it is dodgy to trick purchasers and it is simply wrong morally to invest in people’s homes.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web