• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Englishman’s home isn’t a castle: it’s a revenue stream for an offshore company thanks to national housebuilders, Justin Madders tells the Commons

Englishman’s home isn’t a castle: it’s a revenue stream for an offshore company thanks to national housebuilders, Justin Madders tells the Commons

July 20, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Justin Madders MP makes devastating intervention into the ground rent scandal

Government needs to act against this “worst excess of capitalism”

Select committee needs to question the housebuilders

Taylor Wimpey and others must say how many ex-customers own unsellable, toxic leases

Developer-recommended solicitors need to explain the advice they gave buyers

Justin Madders delivers his agenda-setting speech, with LKP patron Jim Fitzpatrick, who spoke earlier about the work of the APPG on leasehold reform

Justin Madders MP made a devastating intervention in the Commons today demanding government action to resolve the ground rent scandal.

It has the potential to “fundamentally destabilise the housing market if it is not tackled soon”, he told the Commons.

Last December Mr Madders, Labour MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston, called it “the PPI of the housebuilding industry”.

“But now having seen more of the serial failures, deceptions and obfuscations, I believe I may have understated the degree of culpability right across the board.

“The developers, of course, are public enemy number one, but the lenders, the solicitors and even the government all have to take some share of the blame for a scandal which has the potential to fundamentally destabilise the housing market if it is not tackled soon.”

Government has an interest in sorting the issue out 28,146 properties, of which 11,641 are leasehold houses, have been bought on the Help To Buy scheme.

Mr Madders said housebuilders need to be summoned before a full select committee inquiry “into how this practice developed”.

“Developers must be required to give evidence about why this systematic duping of their customers was allowed to start in the first place; who were the authors of those leases that now nobody will sign up to; how many properties were made leasehold needlessly; how much profit they have made out of this scam; and who exactly are the beneficiaries of the leases [ie freehold owners] now?”

Freeholds “are being passed around from one company to another, some are based outside this country and there is secrecy about who the ultimate recipients are of the substantial income coming from the leases.

“There is an old saying that an Englishman’s home is his castle, but it now seems that an Englishman’s home is, in fact, a revenue stream for an offshore company operating from a tax haven.”

Mr Madders also addressed the developer recommended solicitors involved.

“I know that mistakes are made, but it seems incredible to me that so many people make the same complaint about the advice they received at the time of their purchase.

“I surveyed my constituents in leasehold properties and a staggering 80% of them did not know the true nature of what they were buying.

“I think those figures demonstrate that there is a compelling need for further examination of the advice that was provided.

“I have heard of developers offering incentives to use particular solicitors. Why would they do that, and what led to such a collective failure in the profession?”

The full speech can be see at 15.27 here

Or heard:

Full speech:I spoke on this subject in the chamber last December at which point I described the emerging leasehold scandal as the PPI of the housebuilding industry. But now having seen more of the serial failures, deceptions and obfuscations I believe I may have understated the degree of culpability right across the board-
the developers of course are public enemy number one, but the lenders, the solicitors and even the government all have to take some share of the blame for a scandal which has the potential to fundamentally destabilise the housing market if it is not tackled soon.As my honourable friend the member for poplar and limehouse said earlier I am now a vice chair on the all party parliamentary group on leasehold and commonhold reform which he brilliantly chairs alongside the honourable member for Worthing west- they have been superbly assisted by the leasehold knowledge partnership in bringing this matter to the attention of parliamentarians- and , it does seems there is a degree of consensus across the house that these abuses need to be tackled..I understand the Government will be coming forward with plans to tackle some of the abuses in the leasehold sector shortly but it is vitally important that the proposals not only create a clear and fair framework for new builds but that they also create a strategy to deal with the existing rotten mess that developers have created.

There does now appear to be at least some self awareness by developers that leasehold homes are becoming toxic with many now pledging voluntarily not to sell any new homes on a leasehold basis. But that will not assist my constituents who have already bought their homes and have been quoted extortionate sums to buy their properties, or to obtain permission to alter the property or to even ask a question of their landlord. Nor will it assist the many who are already trapped because they have onerous leases that purchasers are no longer interested in signing up to and that some building societies will no longer lend on and it will not assist us in holding to account the guilty men and women who must have known that creating this second lucrative income stream for developers would ultimately be at the cost of their customers.

So developers are now beginning to acknowledge their responsibility with Taylor Wimpey to their credit announcing back in April they were voluntarily going to set up a process so those with the most onerous leases had the opportunity to convert them to new leases where the ground rent increases by rpi instead of doubling every ten years.
That announcement is where the credit stops though as three months on progress has been painfully slow. In the intervening period I have had at least one constituent contact me because their ground rent has doubled since the announcement was made which means that if it ever does get converted to an RPI lease then those rpi increases will be applied to a ground rent that is twice what it could have been. This has ongoing consequences of course should my constituent be ever in a position to purchase the freehold outright. And if she does try and purchase then she will still have to negotiate with the owner of the freehold, whoever that is and will still have to navigate the fiendishly complicated, lengthy and expensive process.

The lease itself may still contain other punitive clauses aside from the ground rent which as we have seen from some examples can include charges of up to £3000 just to get permission for an extension.

And this is all before we consider those who aren’t covered such as second generation purchasers where Taylor Wimpey aren’t the freehold owners. Where do they stand? There is going to need to be an active Government strategy to deal with everyone affected by this scandal. And the Government does actually have a financial interest to sort this out- at the end of March 2017 the number of Help to Buy purchases on leasehold properties stood at 28,146, of which 11,641 are houses.

23 % of all help to buy purchases are leasehold and given concerns about the drop in value of some of the properties with the most onerous leases, there is a real question about whether Government will get all its money back. To my astonishment though there has not yet been any outright ban on help to buy funds being used to purchase leasehold houses.

But let us be clear, Mr Speaker, sorting out the immediate consequences of onerous lease terms must be the start of the process not the end of it. We need to learn the lessons and if necessary legislate so that the worst excesses of capitalism that we have seen here are not allowed to infect our society again. There needs to be a much easier, quicker and cost effective way so people can purchase their freehold outright- and then we need to bring in an outright ban on houses being sold on a leasehold basis.

But there also needs to be a long hard look at how this has been allowed to happen in the first place. I would like there to be a full select committee enquiry into how this practice developed – at the moment we do not even know the extent of it- developers must be required to give evidence about why this systematic duping of their customers was allowed to start in the first place, who were the authors of those leases that now nobody will sign up to, how many properties were made leasehold needlessly, how much profit they have made out of this scam and who exactly are the beneficiaries of the leases now?

These properties are being passed around from one company to another, some are based outside this country and there is secrecy about who the ultimate recipients are of the substantial income coming from the leases. There is an old saying that an Englishmans home is his castle but it now seems that an englishmans home is in fact a revenue stream for an offshore company operating from a tax haven. What is very clear to me is that when people bought their houses they thought they were doing just that, buying their home.

What they never contemplated for a moment was that actually the true owner of their home would be someone they may not ever know the identity of who can sell on their interest in the property to somebody else without their knowledge or consent. It sounds like something out of feudal society not 21st century Britain.

That takes me to what else I would like a select committee enquiry to look at- the legal profession- speaking as a former solicitor myself I know that mistakes are made but it seems incredible to me that so many people make the same complaint about the advice they received at the time of their purchase. I surveyed my constituents in leasehold properties and a staggering 80% of them did not know the true nature of what they were buying- I think those figures demonstrate that there is a compelling need for further examination of the advice that was provided- I have heard of developers offering incentives to use particular solicitors, why would they do that and what led to such a collective failure in the profession?

What advice was given to the lenders whom solicitors also have a duty to? We now know for example that Nationwide will no longer lend on properties with doubling ground rents- it rather raises the question about what theirs and other lenders exposure is and crucially why they granted mortgages on these properties in the first place.

None of the developers will tell us how many properties they have built with these onerous clauses within them. We need to know the scale of the problem- what risk is there to the stability of our lenders and to the housing market itself?

So as I have hopefully demonstrated, the range of issues this scandal highlights are such that we do need a full select committee enquiry as well as legislation- all this hasn’t happened by accident and we need to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Finally Madam Deputy Speaker I wish you, all other members & most importantly the staff who work so hard to keep this place running a restful and peaceful summer break.

Related posts:

Justin Madders MPNational housebuilders ‘sold an illusion’ of home ownership, says Justin Madders MP Justin Madders Bill: 10x annual ground rent and the freehold is yours … Anyone got a problem with that? Ban revenue-generating leasehold houses, says Justin Madders MP. Redrow responds Justin Madders MPJB Leitch loaded leasehold ground rent debt by 222%, Justin Madders tells Commons ‘Fleecehold’ petition launched to stop housebuilders creating YET ANOTHER revenue stream from their customers

Category: Conveyancing Association, Ground rent scandal, HomeSlider, Justin Madders MP, Latest News, News, Parliament, Taylor WimpeyTag: Ground rent, Justin Madders MP, Taylor Wimpey

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « I had to spend £14,000 to change double ground rent to RPI at Ausden Place. But will I get compo from Taylor Wimpey?
Next Post: Government to ban leasehold houses and set ground rents ‘as low as’ zero »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Emma Hynes

    July 20, 2017 at 8:22 pm

    Excellent speech and raised so many valid points. I believe there are three areas to be covered by this campaign. Preventing this scandal from continuing, helping those already caught up in the scandal and finally identifying the key players who caused it.

  2. Phyll Buchanan

    July 20, 2017 at 8:34 pm

    Thank you Justin,

    I am one of the 80% who did not know the true nature of what we were buying and I, like my neighbour’s, now own a house that cannot be sold.

  3. Paddy

    July 20, 2017 at 8:41 pm

    Have just watched Jim Fitzpatrick’s speech of earlier in pm.

    He listed the wider abuses whereas Justin Madders focused on houses mainly.

    Shame recess on us and no bill yet.

    Only needs one line…

    All leasehold is henceforth abolished and will convert to commonhold.

    Next problem…

    • Leasehold reform

      July 21, 2017 at 4:51 pm

      I like your solution the best.. Simple and the point. But what are the lawyers going to do ? And who is going to compensate the hard done by freeholder investor?

  4. Paddy

    July 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm

    Just had email from our new local MP. She’d not even had time to set up her constituency office before I hit her parliament.uk inbox with a copy of the APPG April report and a (long) list of leasehold issues and urged her to join APPG.

    Reply says she will try to attend meetings.

    I’m claiming a result. Won’t name as would be discourteous.

  5. Kim

    July 23, 2017 at 2:29 pm

    Excellent piece in ‘MONEY’ Sunday Times today. Page 13. LKP quoted!! The word is certainly on the street re Toxic Leases.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web