• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Here we go … Bellway porkies to talk up leasehold

Here we go … Bellway porkies to talk up leasehold

March 10, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Bellway, like other developers, has benefitted massively from the taxpayer-funded Help To Buy scheme. But should taxpayers be paying out to create revenue-generating freeholds, owned by murky, anonymous buyers, some of who are offshore? (And who are decidedly NOT all pension providers.)

Bellway is circulating a leaflet in the North West to try to persuade potential buyers that all is well with a leasehold house purchase.

“As part of a leasehold tenure, the homeowner will pay a modest ground rent which they will be made aware of upon enquiry or at the point of reservation …”

That last bit is contentious, as a rather large number of customers, whether Bellway or other housebuilders, claim ground rent is not a term heard often, if at all, from the lips of developers’ sales staff.

Nonsense terms such as “virtual freehold” to explain away the snares of leasehold are quite common, however.

“The benefit of us receiving this annual ground rent allows us to sell leasehold homes at a very competitive price and at a lower cost to the purchaser than a freehold sale.”

This is highly questionable.

There is, on the contrary, evidence showing leasehold properties being sold for the same amount as comparable freehold properties.

Fortunately, owing to housebuilders being caught out over the leasehold houses scandal, informed consumers will hopefully be giving these dubious products a wide berth.

But the most dubious bit is this:

“Do I need to notify the freeholder of any changes?

“You will be required to notify the freeholder if you re-mortgage or if you wish to make alterations to the property.

“Consent for alterations to the building (including extensions, loft conversions and the erection of conservatories) will need to be granted before you may start any works.

“In both instances, there will be a reasonable fee payable and it is important that you seek consent under the lease prior to any alterations as otherwise fees for retrospective consent could be higher.

“These conditions apply to all of our purchasers on both freehold and leasehold sales and ensure that the development you purchase upon retains the original character intended.”

Now there may well be covenants preventing conservatories etc on a freehold house purchase. There may even be a communal service charge to maintain common parts to an estate.

But you certainly do not require any consent from a freeholder, because that is you.

The other big porkie, although it is by no means unique to Bellway, is the continual reference to leaseholders as “homeowners”, as in:

“Ground rent is an annual payment by the homeowner to the person who owns the freehold, payable on 1st of August in
each year …”

Leaseholders are referred to very accurately as “tenants” in all relevant legislation and legal documentation.

If the courts are referring to leaseholders as “tenants”, then the sales blurb from housebuilders should do so as well. The omission of this precision is a major factor in the very convenient confusion over what precisely is involved in a leasehold property purchase.

The full Bellway document is below:
Information on Leasehold Properties all 999 year sites Bellway

Related posts:

Astor Times Front pageFamilies challenge Long Harbour for freeholds to Bellway leasehold houses, The Times reports Bellway fears backlash over leasehold houses may eat into profits Bellway is second developer to face public protest over leasehold cheating Bellway Homes attempts to explain why leasehold houses are just fine. And it is self-interested rubbish … MP urges Commons to condemn developers selling leasehold houses with onerous ground rents. And names Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon, Bellway and Adriatic Land …

Category: Bellway, Ground rent scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: Bellway

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Oxford leaseholders win first round against £60,000 major works bills
Next Post: Some of our freehold clients are offshore, admits Will Astor’s HomeGround »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    March 10, 2017 at 3:36 pm

    OK Bellway,
    Leaving aside the dubious assertion that consents may be needed from the freeholder if the Leaseholder (Please note the word “Leaseholder” and not” Homeowner” Bellway) perhaps you have a scale of charges for seeking such consents that you would be happy to put into the public domain? That way we can compare and contrast the fees charged by a third party you have sold the freehold onto? Please include your charges for late payments etc.
    Obviously potential purchasers of Bellway houses might want to know of any financially crippling administration fees they may end up being liable for once you have sold off the freeholds?

  2. Leaseholder

    March 10, 2017 at 5:28 pm

    “If the courts are referring to leaseholders as “tenants”, then the sales blurb from housebuilders should do so as well. The omission of this precision is a major factor in the very convenient confusion over what precisely is involved in a leasehold property purchase.”

    I totally agree, The freeholder and his managing agents , have all the rights over euphemistically called “owner occupiers”. That is not a term that carries much weight in law. The system underplays the reality of our disadvantaged, if not plain downtrodden, position.

  3. B

    March 21, 2017 at 9:33 pm

    As usual no-one appears to be challenging the term ‘Tenant’ – v – Leaseholder
    A Tenant is the Equity ; paying a wkly and /or mthly Rent – NOT Ground Rent. All the while any buyer acquiesces to this incorrect advice the Lessee home owner loses their rights. Has everyone forgotten Lord Dennings Cmnd 2916? In Equity the Lessor (Freeholder) owns the land whereas in Equity the Lessee owns the bricks & mortar. If this was not so how would you gain a Mortgage? Would there be any need for a Surveyor? If the Lender can’t secure their Charge against bricks & mortar then they will not lend.

  4. Glyn Davies

    April 2, 2017 at 9:32 pm

    Bellway refer to a 999 year lease. Yet they regularly give only 150 year leases; as in the Ellesmere Port case and certainly on a current Heaton Moor, Stockport development. If 999 year leases reduce the price you would expect some marked reduction for only 150 years – absolutely no evidence of this!

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web