• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Help us get government to honour its pledge that leaseholders won’t be paying to remove cladding, says Hilary Benn

Help us get government to honour its pledge that leaseholders won’t be paying to remove cladding, says Hilary Benn

February 9, 2020 //  by Admin4

Hilary Benn Grenfell cladding
Hilary Benn MP speaking at the cladding leaseholders’ event at London City Hall on February 6, organised by LKP and the UK Cladding Action Group (UKCAG)

By Harry Scoffin

Labour heavyweight MP Hilary Benn has called for help to put pressure on government to honour its word that leaseholders would not be dumped with the costs of removing dangerous cladding from their apartment blocks.

Speaking at London City Hall on February 6, at a meeting organised by the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership and UKCAG, the MP for Leeds Central also urged leaseholders to get their MPs to attend his Westminster Hall debate on Wednesday at 2.30pm.

Mr Benn said that the £200 million ACM cladding remediation fund, announced last May to much fanfare by the then Communities Secretary James Brokenshire, was a reaction to the total failure of freeholders to “live up to their responsibilities” as custodians of the buildings they nominally own.

Third-party freeholders have no legal duty to pay for the maintenance of their properties.

The taxpayer bailout for private ACM-clad blocks was about “digging out of a hole the freeholders,” Mr Benn added.

He dismissed the government’s attempt to distinguish between Grenfell style ACM and other types of fire risks: “It doesn’t matter, from the leaseholders’ point of view, whether it’s ACM-clad, HPL-clad, other failures … or fire breaks that were never put in.”

Neither do the fire authorities make any distinction between Grenfell-style aluminium composite material, non-ACM combustibles and the other building issues that pose a material threat to human life, he continued.  

“But the government seems to be diverging from that [professional] opinion,” one attendee called out.

“And that is exactly, Sir, the point I am making. I have just written to the chief fire officer of West Yorkshire [Fire & Rescue Service], who I met a week and a half ago, to try and see whether he is prepared to say that because it’s a binary choice for the fire service: either the building is safe, or it isn’t. If it’s unsafe and you have to have a waking watch, then what is the difference from the point of view of action that the government might be prepared to take?”

Drawing on past experience as a government minister, he said that officials “may be there and sitting thinking ‘crumbs’: if we take on responsibility for this unfolding disaster of an unyet unassessed scale, who knows what’s going to be found in more buildings when people start poking under the cladding and the brickwork and the timber”. But by extending the ACM fund the Treasury would be getting “safe homes and safe circumstances, which is a huge public benefit” and upholding the right to life, fulfilling one of the most basic roles of the state.   

Hands up who is still paying for waking watch after more than two years: the audience at the cladding leaseholders’ meeting at London City hall on February 6

He criticised Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick for suggesting in the Commons last month that his department are in talks with the Treasury to provide hardship loans to leaseholders.

Leaseholders outraged as government weighs up loans rather than cash for buildings with dangerous cladding

Inside Housing, news, analysis, and comment about the social housing sector in the UK.

If this policy was to materialise, it would represent an abandonment of the position held by successive secretaries of state and ministers of state that ‘building owners’ should do the ‘decent thing’ and pay for post-Grenfell remediation works in the private sector and that it would be wrong for tenants to pay for these via the service charge.

Mr Benn suggested such a move would penalise leaseholders who have the misfortune of having dangerous combustible cladding which happens not to be the material used on Grenfell Tower.

He also raised concern that if loans were to be issued to building owners, in the same way the state is set to hand over taxpayer money to absentee freeholders, some offshore and unknowable, the policy could lead to profiteering and further misery for leaseholders:

“How do you guarantee that the freeholder isn’t going to pass the cost of servicing the loan and paying it back to you as leaseholders?”

Related posts:

Hilary Benn City HallCladding leaseholders must unite … and get MPs to attend Hilary Benn’s debate on February 12 Hilary Benn leaseholdGovernment should have equity stake in cladding freeholds covered by the fund, Hilary Benn MP tells APPG Why should Will Astor, Tchenguiz etc be paying to remove Grenfell cladding? Default ThumbnailJohn Healey says it’s ‘wrong’ for leaseholders to have to pay to remove Grenfell cladding Paddington Walk leaseholders have paid £3.5m to remove Grenfell cladding, with more to come …

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: Cladding scandal, Hilary Benn MP, London City Hall, UKCAG

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Roy Wilshire Getting Cayman Islands freeholders to help with cladding crisis is an additional difficulty, says UK’s top fire chief
Next Post: Jenrick breaks cover … to visit Galliard’s New Capital Quay cladding site that was bound to be sorted out Robert Jenrick cladding»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. susan taylor

    February 13, 2020 at 1:08 pm

    This is a disgusting position for leaseholders to be left in through no fault of their own.
    Leaseholders have no choice as to what type of cladding is put on their properties and this decision is often left to people that are not qualified to make these decisions in the first place.
    The lease holders would already have had to pay for this dangerous cladding to be put on their properties. It is entirely down to the landlords. Further scrutiny of all future invoices to leaseholders should be mandatory to make sure any money is not hidden in the service charges in order the landlords try and recoup some of their losses.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web