Leasehold Knowledge Partnership

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

  • Home
    • Site map
  • News
    • ARMA
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Commonhold
    • Countrywide
    • Exit fees
    • Forfeiture
    • House of Lords
    • Insurance scams
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • OFT / CMA
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Quadrangle House
    • Roger Southam
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
  • What is LKP
    • LKP Management
    • Site map
  • Accreditation
    • Accredited Companies
      • Block Managers Limited
      • Clear Building Management
      • Diamond Managing Agents
      • Home from Home
      • HML Andertons
      • HML Hathaways
      • HML Hawksworth
      • HML Shaw
      • Hunter Grey
      • JFM Block & Estate Management
      • Jones Associates Letting & Management
      • Norwich Residential Management
      • Premier Block Management
      • Red Rock Property Management
      • Rynew Property Management
      • Town & City Management
      • Urang Property Management
      • Urban Living Property Management
      • Urban Owners
      • Walton & Allen
  • Fighting back
    • Lease Extension
    • Q&As
    • Right to buy freehold
    • Commonhold
    • Bottomley blasts leasehold crimes on video
    • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
    • Tribunal triumphs … and defeats
    • RTM
    • Video
    • Find MP … and see how many leasehold voters
    • LEASE: what’s the point?
    • Pensioners win £68,500
    • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
    • Insurance racket
    • Local authority leasehold
    • Remember to extend your lease
    • St George’s wins £1 million
    • Leasehold law: the reforms
  • Sub-letting
  • Press
  • Contact
  • Parliament
    • APPG December 14 2016
    • Commons Debate 20/12/16
    • APPG April 19 2017
    • APPG July 5 2017
  • Right To Manage
  • Lease Extension
  • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Louie Burns
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Michael Epstein
  • Donate
  • April 26, 2018
You are here: Home / Latest News / 57% of leaseholders regret buying their property, says LEASE

57% of leaseholders regret buying their property, says LEASE

June 18, 2016 By admin

And two-thirds of leaseholders don’t feel they get a good service from their managing agent

LEASESurveyBigPicThese are two of the results of the survey of leaseholders – and RMC directors –by the Leasehold Advisory Service.

According to the LEASE website, the leasehold survey “is a tool designed to support the sector and not a commercial or business development initiative”.

In total, 1,244 leaseholders took part, including 200 RMC directors.

LEASE says:

“The survey has made a number of alarming discoveries – the vast majority (68%) of leaseholders have little or no confidence in the ability of their managing agent to deal with a problem or dispute, with just 6% being ‘very confident’ their agents would act effectively and efficiently to resolve it.

“Poor communication between managing agents and leaseholders is a real threat to enjoyment of a leasehold property, according to the survey, a problem exacerbated when the lack of clarity and information creates mistrust.

“Furthermore, this is leading to leaseholders feeling they have very little opportunity to be involved in the management of the property, and that they want more democratic decision-making with a greater say on how their service charge is spent in particular.”

Of crucial importance were the views of RMC directors.

The LEASE chairman Roger Southam has stated that after manning the advice lines he was struck by the number of complaints from RMCs, RTMs and where the freehold was owned by the leaseholders.

He wrote in News on the Block in April:

“… from the phone sessions I discovered that a number of the callers were leaseholders who owned their freeholds. This was interesting because I had long thought that owning the freehold as a leaseholder was the panacea that would give the controls and access that is the holy grail.”

The Competition and Markets Authority has already established that RMC / RTM blocks are more harmonious than freeholder-imposed management.

The leasehold survey found:

“RMC directors are generally happier with their leasehold properties than ‘ordinary’ leaseholders due to a greater sense of control over the property’s management.”

The key findings of the leasehold survey were:

  • Just 6% of leaseholders are very confident the managing agent could resolve issues.
  • 68% of leaseholders have little or no confidence that their managing agent could resolve issues efficiently and effectively.
  • 51% of leaseholders see a change in managing agent would improve matters and benefit the block.
  • 1 in 5 leaseholders are unaware they could replace a poorly performing managing agent.
  • 55% of leaseholders consider changing managing agents would be a difficult process.
  • 48% of leaseholders believe a lack of knowledge is a real barrier to changing managing agents.
  • 40% of leaseholders strongly disagree that service charge is value for money.
  • 62% of leaseholders say the service hasn’t improved in the last two years.
  • 55% of leaseholders know where to go for information, but 32% definitely do not.
  • 52% of leaseholders are confident they know their rights and responsibilities.

The leasehold survey also identified that “one of the biggest challenges facing the sector is finding leaseholders willing to take-on the role of RMC director”. There is “a clear polarisation in viewpoints – split between those who find the role strongly rewarding versus those who find it challenging”.

LKP rather doubts whether any of the prime London sites with RMCs, with whom it has regular dealings, took part in the leasehold survey at all.

It was farmed out to Nottingham based Brady Solicitors, which specialises in pursuing debt and advising freeholders on maximising ground rent incomes. LKP advised RMC directors and leaseholders not to participate

Disputes in prime London can involve hundreds of thousands and even millions of pounds, and there is little incentive for directors, who are often professionally distinguished, to share their views in a leasehold survey such as this.

Anthony Essien, LEASE chief executive, said: “The findings will update the sector, including Government, on current sentiment around leasehold management, to continue to inform the debate around raising standards, and we will look to assist leaseholders and RMC Directors with the educational needs identified in the survey.”

Related posts:

LEASE uses debt-collecting Brady Solicitors for leaseholder survey LKP analysis of the LEASE/Brady solicitors leaseholder survey 2016 Leaseholders need ‘counselling and relationship advice’, says LEASE chair Dr Sigmund Southam Is this LEASE being ‘unapologetically on the side of leaseholders’, Mr Barwell? LKP and LEASE thank DCLG civil servant for helping leaseholders

Filed Under: Latest News, LEASE, News, Roger Southam Tagged With: Anthony Essien, Brady Solicitors, LEASE, Leasehold Advisory Service, Roger Southam

Contact LKP

Need help?

LKPhelp2The leasehold game is weighted against ordinary home-owning leaseholders, who aren’t professional players. LKP was set up to redress the balance, to help you win your disputes or at least avoid disasters.

If you have a leasehold problem, you can email sok@leaseholdknowledge or take a chance on calling 07808 328 230.

Or fill out this form, which ensures that you provide the essential information.

Professional services

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders. Click on the logos for company profiles.

Law

Lease extension / enfranchisement


capitalleasehold6-9ins

Landscaping

limetree

LKP Managing Agents

Big managing agents are big because they have got business from developers or large-scale freehold owing companies. Doubtless they are very obliging.

Not a single one is big through consumer choice.

Managing agents accredited to LKP want business from leaseholders. Many are former leaseholders.

All have signed undertakings of good practice and have provided extensive references … from leaseholders.

They can also hand-hold leaseholders through right to manage at minimal cost.

Contact Sebastian O’Kelly at LKP for further details: sok@leaseholdknowledge.com, 07808 328 230

Please click on logos for link and details

Comments

  1. Leaseholder says

    June 18, 2016 at 11:48 am

    “55% of leaseholders know where to go for information, but 32% definitely do not.
    52% of leaseholders are confident they know their rights and responsibilities.”

    These percentages are from those leaseholders who took the survey, so basically already reasonably knowledgeable on LEASE issues. The majority are blissfully unaware of what machinations may be going on.

    Managing agents need licensing and strict regulation, as well as amending the law for proper enforcement to take place. Managing agents also need to be truly independent of the freeholder, otherwise the system remains a feudal one.

  2. martin says

    June 18, 2016 at 1:43 pm

    LKP will be producing a comment piece by the end of the weekend and it should not be assumed the LEASE/Brady survey is an accurate piece of work.

    As leaseholder points out the comment about the knowledge of lease issues is highly unreliable as these are a self selecting group who are more likley to be aware of the issues.

  3. sharon crossland AIRPM says

    June 19, 2016 at 9:11 am

    Why don’t you conduct your own survey? I ‘d be happy to publish it and get it our there!

    • admin says

      June 19, 2016 at 6:15 pm

      Dear Sharon,

      A proper leasehold survey conducted by those who aren’t employed in the sector is a good idea.

      It is a question of resources: we don’t have many.

      If we can get the co-operation of others, it is something that we would consider doing.

      However, even this LEASE survey has hardly come up with a ringing endorsement of leasehold.

      The message to policymakers is clear: this is a problematic area of the housing market that is in need of reform.

      All the best, Sebastian

  4. Ms Hudson says

    June 19, 2016 at 3:07 pm

    I would happily take part in LKP survey as our estate is full of leaseholders forced to accept Peverel/Firstport as mismanagement agents

  5. Peter Coomber says

    June 20, 2016 at 10:18 am

    The LEASE survey was conducted by a non-independant commercial entity – Brady Solicitor’s.
    Brady’s now include pictures/quotes on their website as if Roger Southam colludes with them.
    The reported 1,244 leaseholders out of 4.1 Million leaseholders (0.003 %) is hardly statistically significant – in fact downright misleading. Why did LEASE choose a commercial legal firm
    with a bias to landlords/managing agents when LEASE already use a professional survey firm iPerceptions? I am a director of a Right to Manage Company

  6. admin says

    June 20, 2016 at 1:07 pm

    Pat says:

    I am one of the 57%. The terrible thing is that 40% of all new builds are leasehold properties – a licence for Freeholders/Managing Agents to print money.

    • Michael Epstein says

      June 20, 2016 at 1:51 pm

      And of course the situation is set to get much worse as the curse of leasehold is extended to formerly sold as freehold houses for no other purpose than to exploit homeowners. to the benefit of corrupt developers/managing agents.

    • Leaseholder says

      June 20, 2016 at 5:43 pm

      Did you take part in the survey? In London there is no real choice, is either leasehold or renting. (not a lot of difference,in the eyes off the law leaseholders are tenants) the housing shortage should spur the law makers into action, strengthening the rights of leaseholders and taxing ‘professional’ freeholders ( ie anyone making money from ground rent, however seemingly small amounts. )accordingly. Enforcement and strict regulation is only the beginning – but we need to get it going.

What is LKP?

Sebastian O’Kelly
Martin Boyd
sok@leaseholdknowledge.com
martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Please use the HELP FORM for ALL non-urgent matters.

Only call the numbers below if you are familiar with the LKP website and feel your issue can only be dealt with on the phone. Please do not casually ring up, as we can be deluged by unconsidered calls.

020 8050 2602
07808 328 230

The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership is the secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold and commonhold reform chaired by the MPs Sir Peter Bottomley (Conservative), Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour) and Sir Ed Davey (LibDem). They are also the patrons of LKP.

The deputy chairs are Justin Madders (Lab), Marie Rimmer (Lab) and Baroness Gardner (Con).

More about the aims and origins of LKP here

How your firm can apply to become an accredited managing agent here

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.

LKPnewsletter3

Find everything here …

LKP full archive

… or here

Essential reads

  • Sir Peter Bottomley
  • Martin Paine
  • Roger Southam
  • LKP full archive
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500
  • Benjamin Mire
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Sean Powell
  • Tchenguiz
  • West India Quay
  • Essential guide to lease extensions
  • Forfeiture
  • Press
  • Right to manage and taking control

The reason why

Martin Paine ‘is a crook who is turning sleaze in leases into an art form’,  MPs told

Martin Paine ‘is a crook who is turning sleaze in leases into an art form’, MPs told

More reasons "why" ...

Press

‘Gargantuan’ Grenfell cladding bills from Astor and Tchenguiz on sites such as New Festival Quarter, The Times reveals today

‘Gargantuan’ Grenfell cladding bills from Astor and Tchenguiz on sites such as New Festival Quarter, The Times reveals today

Full Press archive

RSS Latest news from Better Retirement Housing

  • Complain to Advertising Standards Authority about misleading ‘home ownership’ when applied to retirement leasehold tenancies April 19, 2018
  • Love over 50: something we can agree about with McCarthy and Stone April 19, 2018
  • Dear Mr Fenton: I don’t regret my purchase at Rosewood Court, but ‘leasehold is a rip-off’ April 18, 2018
  • McCarthy and Stone: we want you to succeed, but you don’t need ground rents April 16, 2018
  • Park home pensioners demand MPs dump the British Holiday and Home Parks Association from its All Party Parliamentary Group February 4, 2018
  • FirstPort Retirement is admitted to ARMA – finally February 2, 2018
  • ARCO snubs McCarthy and Stone / Churchill by saying there is no need for ground rents January 31, 2018

LKP Managing Agents

Swindon

Manchester

urbanowners

London

JFMManagement

London

Town&City

Nationwide

Nottingham

UrbanLivingLeeds

UrangFulham

RedRock

Essex / Middlesex

NRMlogoNorwich

 

hmlandertonsCroydon

 

hmlhathawaysNorth London

 

hmlhawksworthPimlico

 

hmlshawRichmond, Surrey

Rynew

East London

Diamond

Epsom, Surrey

BlockManagers

Essex

jonesassociates

Macclesfield

Readers comments

  • Stephen on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • David McArthur on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • Stephen on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • Michael Epstein on Taxpayers face £85,000 loss as Homes England accepts leaseholder can pay back loan on flat blighted by Grenfell cladding
  • David McArthur on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • Alec on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • ollie on Taxpayers face £85,000 loss as Homes England accepts leaseholder can pay back loan on flat blighted by Grenfell cladding
  • ollie on Taxpayers face £85,000 loss as Homes England accepts leaseholder can pay back loan on flat blighted by Grenfell cladding
  • Stephen on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • S McDonald on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • Joe on Taxpayers face £85,000 loss as Homes England accepts leaseholder can pay back loan on flat blighted by Grenfell cladding
  • Stephen on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • Alec on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • Fiona on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
  • Paddy on Will Law Commission bring in the ‘seismic changes’ that leasehold needs?
Tweets by @LKPleasehold

DIrection

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Find Everything

LKP full archive

Essential reads …

  • MPs’ APPG on leasehold
  • Benjamin Mire
  • House managers flat
  • Justin Bates
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Oakland Court
  • McCarthy and Stone
  • Canary Riverside
  • Peverel
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Full list of Peverel retirement sites and the constituency MPs
  • Charter Quay
  • Forfeiture
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Commons Debate 20/12/16
  • Roger Southam
  • Sir Peter Bottomley
  • Plantation Wharf
  • West India Quay
  • LEASE: what’s the point?
  • Tchenguiz
  • Sean Powell
  • Press
  • Ground rent scandal
  • Martin Paine
  • LKP anthem
  • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500

Copyright © 2018 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership