Leasehold Knowledge Partnership

The registered charity for leaseholders

Menu
  • Home
    • Site map
    • Archive of posts by category
  • What is LKP
    • Privacy and Data Protection Statement
    • Site map
  • HELP FORM
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Cladding crisis
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Leasehold Valuation Tribunal
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Accreditation
    • Accredited Companies
        • Block Managers Limited
        • Clear Building Management
        • Diamond Managing Agents
        • Dixon Emerald Associates
        • HML Group
        • Home from Home
        • Home Management Group
        • JFM Block & Estate Management
        • Jones Associates Letting & Management
        • Norwich Residential Management
        • Premier Block Management
        • Red Rock Property Management
        • Sapphire Property Management
        • Town & City Management
        • Urang Property Management
        • Vestra Property Management
  • Fighting back
      • Lease Extension
      • Q&As
      • Right to buy freehold
      • Commonhold
      • Bottomley blasts leasehold crimes on video
      • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
      • Tribunal triumphs … and defeats
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Right To Manage
      • Video
      • Find MP … and see how many leasehold voters
      • LEASE: what’s the point?
      • Pensioners win £68,500
      • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
      • Insurance racket
      • Local authority leasehold
      • Remember to extend your lease
      • St George’s wins £1 million
      • Leasehold law: the reforms
  • Sub-letting
  • Press
  • Contact
  • Parliament
      • Communities Select Committee
      • APPG
      • APPG December 14 2016
      • Commons Debate 20/12/16
      • APPG April 19 2017
      • APPG July 5 2017
      • APPG December 14 2016
  • Right To Manage
  • Lease Extension
  • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Louie Burns
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Michael Epstein
  • Donate
You are here: Home / News / Leaseholders pay up to 60% more for buildings insurance because of secret commissions, reports The Times

Leaseholders pay up to 60% more for buildings insurance because of secret commissions, reports The Times

July 18, 2019 By Admin3

The first Times splash this month on how freeholders are defrauding leaseholders on buildings insurance. Jay Beharry, right, and Nina Rautio, assisted neighbour George Shiakallis in his effort to challenge their freeholder at the property tribunal

By Harry Scoffin

The property section of The Times has this month been leading on calls to end opaque insurance arrangements for leasehold blocks.

In a sign of how leasehold is now dominating the news agenda, the title’s investment editor Mark Atherton has published on the issue of secret commissions over two consecutive Saturdays.

Leaseholders call for crackdown on secret insurance commissions

Freeholders and managing agents are overcharging leaseholders for the insurance of their flats, while also pocketing large commissions from the insurers. Campaigners for leasehold reform are calling on the government to crack down on the practice. Sir Peter Bottomley MP, the co-chairman of the Al

APPG co-chair Sir Peter Bottomley was quoted in both pieces.

Sir Peter has described the behaviour of freeholders and their managing agents who deliberately levy sky-high insurance premiums on captive lessees as “corrupt”:

“We believe unfair service charges cost leaseholders hundreds of millions of pounds each year with secret commissions on buildings insurance deals making up a large part of it. Regulators must do more to bring this corrupt practice against leaseholders to an end.”

The MP for Worthing West also said that leasehold insurance scams, including secret commissions, will be raised at a meeting with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

LKP remains concerned that leaseholders do not have to be listed as a joint insured party in the policy document, even though they are the ones doing the paying and typically hold the majority financial stake in a building.

This can make leaseholders susceptible to controversial clauses – ‘first payee’, which favours a freeholder’s lender in the event of an insurance payout following a fire or terrorist attack, being just one example.

Martin Boyd, LKP chair of trustees, said:

“The solution to the loophole is for the FCA to rule that leaseholders are a party to any insurance policy for their buildings.”

Fury over freeholder and agents’ ‘secret’ insurance commissions

Campaigners for leasehold reform are calling on regulators and trade bodies to take action against freeholders and managing agents who overcharge for buildings insurance and hide commissions and other payments. Times Money reported last week that many leaseholders are being overcharged

Since leaseholders are defined in law as tenants, many struggle to get full transparency over what deal their freeholder has signed them up to.

Managing agents can also evade responsibility for unfair insurance practices when the freeholder has kept insurance as a ‘reserve domain’.

Jay Beharry, the London leaseholder activist who shadow housing minister Sarah Jones visited last week to publicise Labour’s leasehold manifesto, has demanded insurance be removed from the hands of distant freeholders:

“One of the things we want to see is the freedom for leaseholders to arrange their own buildings insurance, irrespective of whether they have the right to manage or not.”

The Times has provided an explanation of how innocent leaseholders can be paying well beyond the market rate for the cost of buildings insurance.

Under current rules, flat lessees can only take out contents insurance. Their third-party freeholders have to ensure the building is adequately insured and that the cost is reasonable.

Freeholders will normally task their appointed managing agent to find the most advantageous policy, The Times has learned.

In this scenario, the managing agent’s broker will collect commission from the insurer they have sourced and “may share this with the managing agent and, sometimes, with the freeholder, meaning that three parties are taking a cut.”

Neil Holloway, the M2 Recovery founder who seeks refunds for leaseholders overcharged on insurance, was quoted saying:

“The size of these commissions can amount to between 40 and 60 per cent of the total premium. So where leaseholders of a block of flats are paying £10,000 for insurance, as much as £6,000 of that could be going into other people’s pockets. Managing agents and freeholders are treating buildings insurance as an extra revenue stream.”

Ground rent investor Mark Hawthorn/ Hawthornthwaite is known to take to Twitter to push back against the arguments of campaigners and others shining a light on leasehold

Times journalist Mr Atherton, a leaseholder in South London took his freeholder in upper tribunal and won the case.

In his latest Times article he has the example of Graham Hollingworth, who saw the insurance premiums for his development in Gateshead surge from £9,920 to £35,000.

Mr Hollingworth said that after Residential Management Group (RMG) was replaced in 2016, the premiums came down to £15,925.

Mr Atherton has revisited his leasehold dispute with MB Freeholds, of which Mr Hawthorn is a director using the name Hawthornthwaite (“Leaseholders call for crackdown on insurance commissions, July 5th).

Times journalist defeats MB Freeholds and RMG over insurance dispute

It seems that even after the property tribunal ruled against the freeholder placing the insurance, MB Freeholds is still refraining from noting the residential leaseholders’ interest in the policy:

“The judge ruled that MB could only take over the insurance of our flats if it was itself insuring in joint names, which it was not.

MB is still insuring the individual flats, but not in joint names, and seeking to charge us for the cost.

This is despite RMG acknowledging that more than 50 per cent of leaseholders are insuring correctly.”

Mark Loveday, of Tanfield Chambers, said:

“On the face of it the landlord has not insured in the joint names of the freeholder and leaseholder from June 2018-20. The Upper Tribunal clearly stated that if the landlord has not insured properly it cannot recoup these costs (of insuring the individual flats). It also stated that if the leaseholders were correctly insuring their individual flats in joint names the landlord should not be asking for an extra contribution to cover the cost of insuring the block.”

The article ends with a quote from an exasperated Mr Hawthorn:

“We are acting in the best interests of residents but we will not be made scapegoats of freeholder bashing so are minded to cancel the insurance policy once we have informed leaseholders.”

Today’s Lord Best report has urged that a new regulator of managing agents forces “transparency around potential conflicts of interest (e.g. mandatory disclosure of commissions and management fee charges)”.

This statutory requirement would mean leaseholders could see clearly whether their insurance premiums are high because of kickbacks and other unfair practices.

LKP will push to ensure this transparency principle covers regulated managing agents working for freeholders who insist on placing the insurance themselves, which is a common set-up. As flat lessees know too well, there can be no room for loopholes.

Related posts:

Freeholders’ ‘cowboy’ insurance commissions at leaseholders’ expense attacked in The Times Times reports inquiry into dodgy freeholders Default ThumbnailRich should buy freeholds and cream commissions, says Sunday Times Default ThumbnailHow you get scammed on insurance … with tips from LEASE! Times journalist defeats MB Freeholds and RMG over insurance dispute

Filed Under: Latest News, News, Press Tagged With: insurance, Insurance scams, Mark Hawthorn, Mark Hawthornthwaite, Sir Peter Bottomley, The Times

Contact LKP

Need help?

LKPhelp2The leasehold game is weighted against ordinary home-owning leaseholders, who aren’t professional players. LKP was set up to redress the balance, to help you win your disputes or at least avoid disasters.

If you have a leasehold problem, you can email sok@leaseholdknowledge or take a chance on calling 07808 328 230.

Or fill out this form, which ensures that you provide the essential information.

LKPnewsletter3

Professional services

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders. Click on the logos for company profiles.

Law

Right to manage

Lease extension / enfranchisement


capitalleasehold6-9ins

Insurance

Landscaping

limetree

LKP Managing Agents

Big managing agents are big because they have got business from developers or large-scale freehold owing companies. Doubtless they are very obliging.

Not a single one is big through consumer choice.

Managing agents accredited to LKP want business from leaseholders. Many are former leaseholders.

All have signed undertakings of good practice and have provided extensive references … from leaseholders.

They can also hand-hold leaseholders through right to manage at minimal cost.

Contact Sebastian O’Kelly at LKP for further details: sok@leaseholdknowledge.com, 07808 328 230

Please click on logos for link and details

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein says

    July 18, 2019 at 10:27 pm

    It is not simply a case of adding a percentage(however much) for undisclosed commissions?.
    The insurance scandal goes much wider than that?
    Investigations carried out by the original “Truth About Solitaire” website revealed that developments had been deliberately overvalued for insurance purposes. This increased the premiums paid for amounts that would never be paid out. This afforded extra rebates as the extra amount was never at risk.
    Some rebates were based on development claims records. so some property managers were “encouraged” to refuse legitimate claims in order to protect the managing agents rebates.
    So either the property manager would say “the claim is below the excess” having accidentally given the wrong figure for the excess, or the property managers would wrongly classify a claim to one that attracted a higher excess?
    If this did not work, the claim could be split into several parts, each part coming below the excess.
    Of course it was to be expected that any national managing agent would seek to insure their portfolio on a national basis.. This allowed for greater discounts paid by rebates rather than simply reducing the premiums.
    The Truth About Solitaire website tagged this as the Peverel 500 when first exposing this insurance scandal.

  2. Brad says

    July 19, 2019 at 6:49 am

    Regarding Mark… I’ve never interacted with the guy but i have spoken to some leasehold trolls with remarkably similar language. I followed him on twitter 2 weeks ago as I’m interested in what he shares publically. Anyway… Just checked today and i have been blocked?! My account has very little leasehold commentary, maybe we’ve met on another account?

What is LKP?

The All Party Parliamentary Group for leasehold and commonhold reform ceases with the dissolution of Parliament. But we will be back after the election …

Sebastian O’Kelly
Martin Boyd
sok@leaseholdknowledge.com
martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Please use the HELP FORM for ALL non-urgent matters.

Only call the numbers below if you are familiar with the LKP website and feel your issue can only be dealt with on the phone.

020 8050 2602
07808 328 230

The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, a registered charity and the secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold and commonhold reform, is explained here

Managing agents can apply to become an accredited managing agent here




LKPnewsletter3

Find everything here …

The reason why

‘Cameron’s brother-in-law Will Astor and the toxic leasehold scandal’, Daily Mail

More reasons "why" ...

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Press

McCarthy and Stone: Ground rents are not the future of retirement housing

Full Press archive

MPs don’t like what they see …

John McDonnell is a leaseholder, reveals Daily Mail in hatchet job article

The Daily Mail has tried to smear shadow chancellor John McDonnell over his modest Norfolk holiday chalet, worth £170,000, which is leasehold. The only public interest argument for this article was that John McDonnell “was accused of hypocrisy over his plans to clamp down on buy to let landlords after it was revealed that he […]

APPG on leasehold reform cancelled owing to terror attack on Westminster

An hour and half before it was due to start, the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform was cancelled owing to the attack on Westminster this afternoon. So far as we are aware, none of the 70-odd invitees had at that point arrived at the palace, where the meeting was to take place at […]

More Posts from this Category

Ground rent scandals

Dear Pete Redfern (again) … Opaque leases, dubious ‘independent’ legal advice, no contact from Taylor Wimpey during its ‘review’, normal industry practice to stuff clients with leasehold houses (especially in North West)

Devastating letter to Taylor Wimpey CEO from a member of the National Leasehold Campaign Facebook group: Dear Mr Redfern, I read with some interest the announcement and presentation of Taylor Wimpey’s Full Year Results for 2016, published last Tuesday, 28th February. There are a few issues I feel compelled to raise: 1. You state in […]

Gavin Barwell: ‘No excuse for leasehold houses or punitive ground rents and we will stamp them out’

Gavin Barwell, the housing minister, said yesterday that there was no excuse for leasehold houses or onerous ground rent terms, and the government was going to stamp them out. Speaking at the “annual conference” of the Leasehold Advisory Service – in fact, a trade show for professionals employed in the leasehold sector who pay £350 […]

Countryside Properties plc cracks over ground rents scandal …

… it is buying back freeholds from investors … E&J Estates says it won’t buy more freeholds to leasehold houses … Oh, and it ‘fully supports’ the government’s consultation over the scandal UPDATE: It seems the deal only applies to 4-5 sites where E&J Capital Partners are the freeholders AND where ground rents double every […]

More Posts from this Category

Grenfell cladding

APPG hears agony of Grenfell cladding on private sites, while Lendlease sites head to tribunal to get leaseholders to pay

In the absence of anyone else doing anything, LKP organised the first meeting of private leaseholders in blocks with Grenfell style cladding … but developers like Lendlease stayed away. The meeting was the first opportunity for leaseholders in 297 tower blocks to meet and exchange information and support. No developers, warranty providers or freeholders turned […]

New Capital Quay leaseholders to sue Galliard over Grenfell cladding

This is the first site in England to begin legal action against its landlord and developer The action taken by the leaseholders is against Galliard Homes Ltd and the site’s landord Roamquest Ltd a firm owned in Galliard Holdings Ltd and NCQ Development Ltd which in turn is owned by Galliard Homes Ltd The leaseholders […]

More Posts from this Category

When leaseholders unite …

Why has it taken so long to regulate the leasehold sector?

For over a decade successive Housing Ministers and Secretaries of State have been assured by civil servants that leasehold legislation was balanced, and that self-regulation in the leasehold sector was working well. That position abruptly ended earlier this year when Secretary of State Sajid Javid announced that the government now intended to crack down on […]

More Posts from this Category

Disgraceful …

Martin Paine demanded ground rents of thousands from two London leaseholders

  [pro_ad_display_adzone id=”11520″ popup=”1″ delay=”7″ exit_popup=”1″ popup_opacity=”0.3″]It is not just Blythe Court … two London leasehold owners also faced demands of thousands of pounds in unexpected ground rents after purchasing flats in different parts of the capital. The leaseholders came forward following the publication last month by the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership of the issues at […]

More Posts from this Category

RSS Latest news from Better Retirement Housing

  • The Times says families ‘lost £3 billion’ on resales of leasehold retirement flats, while developers and freehold speculators made millions
  • Churchill Retirement donates £150,000 to Conservatives. To retain ground rents, by any chance?
  • Guardian reports dismal retirement flat re-sale prices, as seller ponders £28,000 offer
  • Your Housing Group shared equity retirement flat that sold for £38,000 on ITV
  • Elderly Accommodation Counsel says ‘recent retirement flat resales have increased in value’

LKP Managing Agents

Herts

Essex

London and South East

Tyne and Wear

Colchester

Swindon

Manchester

 

JFMManagement

London

Town&City

Nationwide

UrangFulham

RedRock

Essex / Middlesex

NRMlogoNorwich

 

Nationwide

Diamond

Epsom, Surrey

BlockManagers

Essex

jonesassociates

Macclesfield

DIrection

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Find Everything

Essential reads …

  • Ground rent scandal
  • Parliament
  • MPs’ APPG on leasehold
  • Benjamin Mire
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Oakland Court
  • McCarthy and Stone
  • Persimmon
  • Recognised Tenants’ Association
  • Cladding crisis
  • Canary Riverside
  • John Christodoulou
  • Peverel
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Charter Quay
  • Forfeiture
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Law Commission
  • Plantation Wharf
  • West India Quay
  • LEASE: what’s the point?
  • Tchenguiz
  • Sean Powell
  • Press
  • Exit fees
  • William Waldorf Astor
  • Martin Paine
  • LKP anthem
  • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500
  • Park Homes
  • Redrow
  • Retirement

Copyright © 2019 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership