• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Pull the other one, Vincent! Leasehold reform hasn’t stuffed Fairhold. It was downgraded in 2015 …

Pull the other one, Vincent! Leasehold reform hasn’t stuffed Fairhold. It was downgraded in 2015 …

January 3, 2019 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

 

In today’s Financial Times interview, Vincent Tchenguiz says the sale of his Fairhold Securitisation Limited has collapsed because of buyers’ concerns over government reforms to leasehold.

Vincent Tchenguiz pushes back on UK leasehold reform

Property tycoon Vincent Tchenguiz is lobbying against proposed changes to the leasehold system that his company says threaten “unintended detrimental consequences to the entire property market”. Mr Tchenguiz, whose Consensus Business Group is one of the largest holders of UK freeholds, told the Financial Times there were “grounds to keep the freehold-leasehold system working” despite a scandal over escalating ground rents.

But in 2015 Moody’s downgraded the securitization, based on ground rents and other incomes in residential freeholds in the retirement sector.

https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-Downgrades-UK-ground-rent-backed-Fairhold-Securitisation-Limited–PR_330495

While Moody’s recognised “the very good quality and predictability of the cash flows derived from ground rents”, it noted:

“The loan’s repayment relies on the receipt of ground rent payments, warden’s apartments rents and transfer fees arising from freehold and long leasehold reversionary interests in 406 sheltered housing developments (the “Portfolio”) owned by thirteen property owning subsidiaries of the Borrower. The portfolio’s cash flows relate to 18,678 sheltered housing apartments and 310 warden’s apartments located in town centers throughout the United Kingdom.

“The transaction has been performing well with no issues to date. Therefore, the very high default probability of the loan is principally due to the refinancing risk when the loan reaches maturity in October 2015 and as such the default risk of the notes is concentrated in the period between the loan maturity date and note maturity date in 2017.

“Moody’s is aware that ground rent portfolios are potentially attractive to certain type of investors, in particular those looking for exposure to long-dated, inflation-linked cash flows. Despite this, Moody’s believes that ground rent portfolios are still a relatively niche asset class, and as such the market is still neither particularly deep nor are ground rent portfolios apparently liquid. This, combined with the challenging hedging structure caused Moody’s to further revise its refinancing outlook for the underlying loan to incorporate a very high probability of default at the loan’s maturity date.

“The other driver of the ratings is Moody’s valuation. The portfolio valuation supplied in the investor reporting follows an actuarial approach. There is doubt in Moody’s view whether a buyer of the portfolio would purchase solely based on an actuarial valuation, given the uncertainty around projecting very long-dated cash flows. Market comparables to date have indicated that a yield-based approach would be used to value similar portfolios.”

In the Financial Times, Mr Tchenguiz says reform of leasehold could have “unintended detrimental consequences” such as pension funds forced to write down loans – and higher home prices.

This nonsense was debunked by Persimmon here:

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/persimmon-sold-leasehold-houses-50000-size-freehold-houses-harrow-view-west

Mr Tchenguiz also warned against commonhold saying: “There is complexity in commonhold, with multiple parties trying to run a building, especially if you have a building with 300 tenants.”

Complexity is not an unfamiliar concept to the interests of the Tchenguiz Family Trust, based in the British Virgin Islands, with one judge describing the company structure as “quasi-Biblical”:

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/charter-quay-wins-400000

Leaseholders in retirement flats, in Huddersfield terraces and prime London riverside apartments may also be surprised to see Mr Tchenguiz raising an “ethical concern” over lenders such as pension funds being forced to write down loans.

The FT article also quotes William Kenneth “Bill” Procter, chief executive of Mr Tchenguiz’s Consensus Business Group residential division – who appears in the Panama Papers in his own right – telling the Communities Select Committee that the limiting of ground rents would mean “freeholds will be of no interest to investors . . . and developers’ existing business models will have to be adjusted, potentially leading to higher prices for homebuyers”.

https://www.ft.com/content/79be0434-03ab-11e9-99df-6183d3002ee1

Mr Tchenguiz also tells the FT that it is unreasonable for the government to expect freehold speculators such as himself to pay millions to remove Grenfell cladding from private sites when “sometimes on a block we could be collecting a total of £10,000 of rent [annually]”.

“The cladding issue we believe is the responsibility of either the government or the [leaseholder] residents,” he said.

LKP does not entirely disagree, although we would say it is the responsibility of either building regulators or the developers and their warranty providers who built the buildings.

But financiers speculating in ground rents are not the beneficial long term custodians of buildings, they are simply the purchasers of its hopefully-soon-to-be-terminated income streams.

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/why-should-will-astor-tchenguiz-etc-be-paying-to-remove-grenfell-cladding

There is no prospect at all of these usually privately equity operators paying out, and the courts have so far ruled that they should not do so: Mr Tchenguiz, for example, at Citiscape in Croydon.

One omission from the Financial Times article is the Rothesay Life debenture on the Tchenguiz ground rent incomes, which means that Mr Tchenguiz himself is having to rely on the consent fee incomes in leasehold to service his loans.

Here is an example of one consent fee that was reconsidered after the intervention of LKP:

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/tchenguiz-backs-5000-demand-conservatory-built-25-years-ago

Curiously, the ground rent funds Long Harbour and Wallace Partnership Group are remunerated in the same way. They buy residential freeholds for private equity interests (and possibly some pension funds), which receive the ground rents, while they receive the more questionable consent fee incomes from the leaseholders.

So charging an old lady £80 to keep a cat is an important part of the business.


And here are a few others, courtesy of retired leaseholder Charles Willis:

Registration Of:
*New owner-£125.00
*Remortgage-£125.00
*Land Registry if consent is required – £205.00

Renting out Flat:
*Registering new tenant for letting your property-£130.00
*Renewal of a new tenant for Letting your property-£65.00
*Written confirmation letting not required-£70.00

Selling Flat:
*Welcome Pack when selling your Flat-£135.00
*Permission/Consent to sell your property-£175.00

Consent for Pets:
*Pets-£80.00

Consent Major Works-£395.00
*Removal walls
*Build Conservatory
*Porch extension
*Parking bollard
*Driveways
*Stair lift
*Solar Panels

Consent Minor Works-£195.00
*Wooden flooring
*Window replacements
*Gas central heating
*Relocation of Boiler/Flue
*Bath/shower conversion
*Satellite Dish
*Stud Walls
*Fencing
*Sheds

General fees:
*Statement Ground Rent-£65.00
*Purchasing copy of your lease-£185.00

Related posts:

James Tuttiett’s tangled web of E&J freeholds scrutinised by the Guardian All Party Parliamentary Group: this is how to reform leasehold Will Astor ‘tried to nobble reform of ground rents’, Daily Mail claims Serious Farce Office messes up again, with £6m so far to Vincent Labour to cap ‘legalised extortion’ of ground rents and end leasehold houses … Opposition and government now compete to reform leasehold

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, News, Press, TchenguizTag: Citiscape, Financial Times, Long Harbour, Moody's, Vincent Tchenguiz, Wallace Partnership Group, William Kenneth Procter

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Farewell to newbuild leasehold houses?
Next Post: Leasehold house owners thank Brokenshire after Persimmon sells freehold to leasehold house for less than £3,750 »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Chris

    January 5, 2019 at 3:28 am

    Indebted Tchenguiz`s argument regarding common hold is counter-intuitive.

    If he claims leasehold is needed to be the guardian of a building and common hold would fail to do that (unlike the ROTW who seem to manage buildings perfectly adequately) then just owning the freehold as an asset for income, does not make you the building owner.

    Therefore, why should a company with minor financial investment in the building as he claims, have the monopoly over the say in the building maintenance? Surely, that choice should be with the major investors in the building – the leaseholders. Another flaw in the leasehold argument.

    They are guardians when it comes to an income stream but not when faced with repairing an unsafe clad building – which is the legal obligation under The Building Act 1984 for a freeholde of the building. Whether the fault lies with developers, government regulations or local authorities for cladding issues, nonetheless, the freeholder is recognised as the building owner and should foot the repair bill. It will be up to them to pursue any other party through the courts for reimbursement. No rights without responsibility.

    So, if it is established that the freeholder is indeed the building owner then they should pay for cladding removal. Alternatively, if they are not considered building owner, but just an asset investor, then the management of the building should be the remit of the leaseholders to appoint their own service management company.

    • admin

      January 5, 2019 at 12:37 pm

      Very good points, and well expressed.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web