• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Cramlington: The wet dream of housebuilders, where everything is sold leasehold

Cramlington: The wet dream of housebuilders, where everything is sold leasehold

January 23, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Survey on onerous ground rent data. Please fill this in if you have a leasehold house with exploitative ground rent terms


 

Cramlington: Where plc housebuilders have managed to persuade (the unaffluent) local people that leasehold houses are perfectly normal, rather than wealth erosion. Cramlington is not a historic factory town of tied housing. The property here is sold leasehold simply because the developers have got away with it, thereby creating an investment asset class for wealthy investors.

By Michael Ellis

I live in Cramlington in Northumberland, a new town which began its development in the Sixties by what is now Bellway and Persimmon homes.

The vast majority were sold as leasehold and only now, as leases reach a critical point in their tenure where mortgages are difficult to get if the freehold has not been purchased or extended, are people understanding how much of a trap they are becoming.

There are many new developments in Cramlington and in neighbouring towns and constituencies that have new build homes being sold as leasehold.

One Bellway development is charging £11,000 to purchase the freehold at the time of sale. Annual ground rent if not purchased as freehold would be £299.

These additional sums to purchase a house are really scandalous and unnecessary, but have somehow been imposed on this area.

It makes it more likely for first time buyers who have to save for a deposit, to fall into the leasehold trap.

I find it very frustrating that no developer is being held to account over the issue.

Each time I’ve asked at a development why homes are being sold leasehold, I’ve been met with a “They just are” response, as no one is able to justify the practice.

I’ve contacted my local MP, Ronnie Campbell as well as neighbouring MP, Ian Lavery and Mary Glindon to get involved with the All Part Group on leasehold reform as this issue also affects their constituencies.

Furthermore, Cramlington’s leasehold legacy has featured in the media, notably in the Daily Mail in 2015.

I look forward to what the APPG is able to achieve and hopefully England can go the way of Scotland and abolish the practice.

The background is this: Cramlington was primarily developed by William Leech which became part of the Persimmon Group, and J.T Bell which became the Bellway group.

The partnership between the two housebuilders still exists today as part of the LeeBell Consortium and they have developments going through the planning phase at the moment for almost 2,000 homes across various sites in Cramlington, as well as a smaller development of over 700 homes by Barratt.

This is a significant amount of homes that will come to the market over the coming years.

Based on current form from the housebuilders they will probably all be sold as leasehold unless the practice can be stopped.

From the developments I’ve visited in the area, there are very few which are being developed with homes being sold as freehold.

I also understand that Barratt only sell homes as leasehold in the North East of England and the Sheffield area [the CEO of Barratt told the APPG in December that his company had built 1,000 leasehold houses primarily in the Manchester area.

Taylor Wimpey is actually selling its local developments as freehold, and has anway undertaken not to sell homes with leasehold tenure at new sites from January 1.

Taylor Wimpey and Bellway have a joint development at Holystone Park on North Tyneside.

Taylor Wimpey is selling homes freehold, but literally on the other side of the street (you can walk across from one showhome to the other), Bellway is selling homes as leasehold, which is quite ridiculous.

Miller Homes have just started on site in the last couple of weeks on a new development (Barley Meadows) in Cramlington, and the three Miller developments nearby at Seaton Delaval, Blyth and Shiremoor are all being sold leasehold. So I imagine this development will also be sold with leasehold tenure.

Whether you’re a first time buyer or not, getting a deposit together either from savings or equity from a sale of another home is hard. Finding that extra cash to buy the freehold is probably next to impossible even if you can add the cost on to a mortgage (if the bank will allow it), so I imagine many homebuyers purchase a new home with a leasehold tenure as they have no choice.

We do have some local action starting to take place as one local estate agent, Paul Reynolds from Renown Estates is trying to galvanize local councillors and residents to start taking action as well as raise the issue in council meetings.

However, this action does seem to be aimed primarily at the issues of existing homeowners of leasehold properties.

I would like to ask, what do the banks have to say on this matter? Is there any way that banks could be pressured to stop any further lending on new build leasehold properties? I’m sure if the means of financing mortgages dries up the house builders would soon change their ways.

 

Related posts:

Leasehold houses have been sold for more than freehold ones, reports Telegraph Leasehold ‘a lucrative way to stop people from buying their own home outright’ – Daily Mail ITV News says 45,000 leasehold houses sold in last five years. LKP claims £300-500m new home freeholds sold every year Justin Madders MPNational housebuilders ‘sold an illusion’ of home ownership, says Justin Madders MP Last year: £64.8bn leasehold properties sold. £13.7bn was new-build. Leasehold house numbers double. Developers make £300-500 million a year from ground rent sales

Category: Bellway, Ground rent scandal, Latest News, News, Persimmon, Taylor WimpeyTag: Bellway, Cramlington, Taylor Wimpey

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Bellway offers young mother freehold for £3,750. But Adriatic Land demands £12,750 … then agrees to half the sum
Next Post: Now Daily Telegraph wades into the leasehold house racket »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    January 23, 2017 at 2:57 pm

    Would it be possible to lobby local authorities to make it a condition of planning consent that homes are sold on a freehold and not leasehold basis?

    • Paul

      February 20, 2017 at 10:01 pm

      That’s my aim Michael.

  2. dermotmckibbin

    January 25, 2017 at 10:08 am

    I do not think that local authorities have the power to require existing leasehold houses to be converted into freehold houses where they are sold.

    However it may be possible for local authorities to require developers in newly built schemes to require houses to be sold as freehold and not leasehold.. It may be possible to do this as a requirement of planning permission for newly built properties. This issue needs to be explored further.

  3. Trevor Bradley

    January 25, 2017 at 11:19 am

    ME and Dermot,
    I think that would be an excellent additional approach to this problem.
    In fact in the area I live (just outside Coventry) the local council have just announced plans of a major building programme in various spots and I was already thinking of trying to make them aware that building permission should only be given on the understanding all HOUSES must be Freehold

  4. Trevor Bradley

    January 25, 2017 at 10:41 pm

    Dermot, Rushmore Council Charter is reasonable info but does not go anywhere near far enough.
    It only refers to mixed tenure homes, which means apartments.
    It also says copy of lease should be given to “residents”. That means they have already purchased.
    What it should say is copy of lease should be given to “prospective purchaser” so it can be scrutinised by appropriate persons before purchase.
    Moving forward we are talking about Houses here. Houses, except in exceptional circumstances, do NOT have to be sold Leasehold. So they are somewhat standing on the fence here – clever.
    The council charter should say that no planning permission will be granted unless houses are built with Freehold Status.

  5. Judy

    February 21, 2017 at 12:11 am

    I purchased a buy to let flat in cramlington – £300 a year ground rent. Shocking.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web